• OneLemmyMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    147
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s true that it’s not always about the money, but it’s probably never about a ping pong table

  • peto (he/him)@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is a bit of truth here. Toxic culture and out of touch management will make people walk as well.

    Thing is, there might just be a wad of cash big enough to make me put up with that against my health interests.

    Fuck ping pong tables though. No one left a company because they didn’t have enough fucking table sports. If you think they are then you are the problem. Exit interview your own fucking arse.

    • dabadee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Around 2012 I had a interview with a recruiter, he asked me what kind of company you’re looking for, and I replied, one without a ping pong table, he laughed at me, I am an immigrant, left home when I was 19, so around 2008 went around in my country and EU, and already understood that whenever a company had a ping pong table it had a shitty culture, so by the time of that interview I already seen more than enough shitty companies, but I remember that interview in particular because the guy started making fun of me, laughing at me

      11 years after, I wish I could speak with that recruiter to see if he understood that ping pong tables are low efforts solutions adopted by shitty-environment companies and if he would laugh at me again

      • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        He had to laugh at you, otherwise he would have cried because he knew you were right.

    • HellAwaits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve seen companies install an whole-ass arcade room with skee ball machines and tout them like crazy. I was too naive at the time to think they were just masking a HORRIBLE company culture that makes people feel like absolute garbage.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Notice how they’re always empty when they show them to you?

        They don’t even give employees time to play them…

    • TurboFool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the truth is that it assuming it’s the latter may not be enough. But the first two are even less likely. Additional responsibilities WITHOUT a raise is very, very unlikely to be what anyone was waiting for to stick around.

    • EverStar289@citizensgaming.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is what I came to say. Good management will make people stay for a long time with less pay.

      But obviously HR doesn’t get that lmao.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah, the "not necessarily pay is accurate, but the “right” answer being ping-pong table pivots things from “ok, they have some understanding” to “incredibly tone deaf”.

    • TommySalami@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Man, my job pays horribly and the benefits barely cover anything, but they have a ping-pong table so it’s honestly a tough call.”

      I struggle to understand how someone could seriously write something like that question without a lack of self-awareness so dire that a walk to the kitchen would come with a near-death experience. It just can’t be real.

    • Hasherm0n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of the best bosses I ever had once told me that people will stay for the culture but leave for money. His philosophy was to try and ensure that money was not a factor in people’s decision, then build as good a culture as he could.

      And to be clear, by making money not a factor, I mean he paid well.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I had a meeting years ago with my company’s CTO about my salary. He kicked off the meeting by saying “you care a lot more about what you make than I do” which prompted me to ask for 50% more than I had been planning to ask for. He agreed to it without argument. TBF he was a coke addict married to the daughter of the company’s owner and within six months he’d been divorced and fired, but I got to keep my salary.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As a professional in this field, top reasons would be…

    • Dissatisfaction with pay
    • Limited/No career progression
    • Dissatisfaction with environment/culture
    • Dissatisfaction with management
    • Poor work-life balance
    • Poor job design/expectations of role
    • Poor taining quality/knowledge management
    • Inadequate tools/systems

    Edit: I should also point out we have about half a dozen ping-pong tables scattered around my work and our turnover figures were bang on average for annual benchmarking against the sector. I consider the average too high, though, and will be targeting better retention over this year. We’ll need at least double the amount of ping-pong tables.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t see pizza party or ping pong table on that list so you’re obviously not a professional.

      A real professional knows employees want pizza parties instead of higher pay and they want more responsibilities with the same pay!

      :P

    • Pechente@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Almost all of these applied to the last job I left, so I guess it’s pretty spot on.

    • Trizza Tethis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My top reasons for leaving a job:

      • Too little pay
      • Too many responsibilities
      • The possibility of career progression

      The three Big Nos. My optimal work-life balance is 0.1-99.9. If they trust me to be able to do even one thing, that pay better be huge.

    • alertsleeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      you really a pro, I’m looking for other jobs precisely because of 1 and 2, even though the rest are all great at my current job

      • saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Strategic Workforce Planning. It’s a bit different to HR in that there’s a lot of data analysis. Typically we would use data to identify retention issues (reasons, areas, seasonality, etc) and figure out how to improve it. We’d then hand that over to HR to implement fuck up.

  • NotAFuckingBot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s only been two reasons for me to quit a job: shitty pay and shitty people in charge.

    Sounds like this company has both.

    • kurosawaa@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      seriously,who has time to use a ping pong table at work? It’s like a decoration to remind you you’re not having fun.

      • myplacedk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Where do you live, where taking breakes is frowned upon? That’s crazy.

        Here in Denmark, I’m being reminded to take breakes and go home. I have been asked if I’m sure it’s not hurting my work/life balance, before getting overtime approved.

        It’s also common to stay at work after hours to hang out, if there’s a nice place to do that.

          • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Same in my office in the UK, I got asked if I was not taking enough breaks or doing work outside of work hours as I was doing more than they expected and my manager was worried about me burning out, but having a chill atmosphere and a nice place to hang out and chill in the office just means that I can be more productive and happier at work so it’s a win-win… A lot of HR types don’t realise that it takes a nice office in both material and culture to make people productive and just go for the former which has the lower effect of the two when used alone.

          • myplacedk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve been told multiple times to take more sick leave.

            Usually when I come back from sick leave, I’ve been told I should have taken a day more to recover fully. But after days in bed, I just really want to start doing something, even if I’m tired.

        • Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know that the American capitalism thing is a meme at this point, but working in software, every company I’ve worked for isn’t against you taking breaks or doing whatever as long as things get done. I’ve played foosball with my VP during normal hours before, and it was slightly awkward but good fun.

          The usual issue I see in my industry is that you constantly accumulate more responsibilities without any corresponding increase in pay. It’s especially bad for morale when you see someone leave, and their responsibilities get distributed to the team, but no one gets any part of the old person’s salary as a raise to make up for the added responsibilities even when the higher ups refuse to hire a replacement since you’re all clearly handling it fine.

        • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s nice and all, but staying after hours to hang out sounds awful. I don’t want to befriend those losers, I want to get on with my life. They can all rot in hell for all I care, I’d sell them out in a heartbeat.

          • myplacedk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s fine, I can’t expect everybody to like that kind of stuff.

            But it’s still important to have that for those that do. And of course that people more like you, get what you want.

  • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    None of these answers is correct, it’s simply not a multiple choice question.

    For some the pay is important, others need a bit of distraction like a ping pong table.

    Everybody has their own needs, the biggest HR loser is the one that fits all employees in the same square.

  • 𝕯𝖎𝖕𝖘𝖍𝖎𝖙@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s true, most people don’t care about money.

    They care about what money can help them buy, like another day of survival.

    It was never about the money. It was about maslovs heirarchy of needs; which, at the very bottom, is a foosball table.

    • myplacedk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s two kinds of money: Enough money, and more than enough money.

      If you don’t have enough money, that’s all that matters. A nicer day at work means very little.

      Once you have enough money, more money matters very little. Now it’s about enjoying work etc.

      • TheGreenGolem@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is brilliant!

        Tangentially related, I heard another about enough money:

        When you already have enough money, do you really need 2x enough money?

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          As a person with enough money, yes, I would love double my income.

  • plumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I had this argument with a boomer HR consultant and she just doubled down, even though I explained that neither I nor my colleagues, give two hoots about fussball or team building. Our position is a resounding “fuck you pay me” but oh no - boomer knows best.

    • ikapoz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unless of course your job is to be a ping pong ball tester, in which case you may not be getting supported with the necessary tools to perform your job successfully.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, the main reason Ive changed jobs is money. Nobody gives raises like new bosses.

    • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      I always tell people the easiest way to get a raise is to find a new job. Nobody is keeping up with inflation anymore, it’s pretty much required to job hop to break even anymore.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Especially if you know exactly that your employer most likely has zero loyalty to you either.

      If there was a way to get the same work for 20% less, my employer would happily do that.

      I never understood that logic, tbh. It can’t be good for a business to lose half the staff every few years. Bringing in fresh blood once in a while is good, but you shouldn’t need constant transfusions.

  • Commiunism@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Questions like these make me wonder if large capitalists actually live in an alternate universe but through some time and space shenanigans they are still here. There’s just no way they can make this type of shit up (assuming it’s a real question) without being delusional or sadistic.

    • SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s just no way they can make this type of shit up (assuming it’s a real question) without being delusional or sadistic.

      Of course there is: they want to implement doublethink. It’s a deliberate attempt to make workers not to pursue their own rational interest when it conflicts with corporate profits.

    • speaker_hat@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m sorry to say but psychopaths walk among us every day, you just need to play the game, until you find a better gig

    • Cobrachickenwing@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      These people live in the future where automatons make money for them for nothing. It’s why uber is pushing for automated cars. They don’t care about the present.

    • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You gotta have hr (the worker who defends the bosses interests) on your side if you wanna drop $300 on a ping pong table rather than raises.

    • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I worked at a soul-crushing insurance job, we were given an event where the bosses served us pancakes. That was right after we were forced to celebrate bosses’ day and watch our bosses open gifts that the suck-ups got them. I was able to quit without notice shortly after and it felt so goddamn good.

  • frazw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is pretty simple. Respect your employees and they will respect you. Respect starts with calling the employee’s contributions by paying them a fair wage. It continues with treating them well. A post of treating them well might be a point ping table, but that comes on top of a fair wage, not instead of.

    A good manager might recognise a hard working team needs a way to relax and gets a pool table or something. The employees are happy and tell their friends they’ve got a pool table at work, everyone is jealous. It seems like the pool table is the reason but it is just a symptom of them being generally treated well.

    • TheRealLinga@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder if this is how this whole trend started: some decent manager recognized their hard working well-paid and taken care of team deserved some extra something, got them a pool table or whatnot, then other shittier companies copied this thinking it was a solution in itself without understanding why the thing was installed in the first place

  • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, we’re the fucking generation that can’t afford our own living, but have you tried giving us a ping-pong table?