• Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    444
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fuck Forbes. They prop up conservatives and conservative talking points. They also post screens of tweets from conservatives, like the dickbag (from this article) who referred to the Ukraine army as “Ukronazis”.

    The news of this attack is great to hear, but we should not be supporting Forbes with clicks. They are the enemy.

    • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I tend to agree with you, but I also think it’s important to know how the “enemy” thinks and interpret the news. I don’t think we should lock ourselves up in echo bubbles only reading stuff we agree with.

      • Pisodeuorrior@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In theory I’d agree with you. I don’t mind reading of nuances or different opinions than mine.

        In general however, conservative media are worthless piece of shit embarrassments that I don’t want to waste time on.

        There’s a difference between discussing with sometime with a different opinion, and stopping in the middle of the road responding to every deranged, mentally challenged ignorant mean crack addict who yells their vision of the world from the top of a soap box.

        • figaro@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agreed. They don’t argue in good faith. Their goal is not honesty and truth. What’s the point in engaging with someone like that?

          • bobman@unilem.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Arguing in good faith is the important part.

            As soon as I engage with someone not arguing in good faith, I leave. There’s just no point.

        • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Comparing Forbes to a deranged, mentally challenged crack addict isn’t very fair, whatever your opinion is on Forbes or crack addicts.

      • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        We don’t need to post their blatant propaganda as if it were a reliable source in order to do that though.

    • SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Forbes is just a blogging platform where “contributors” can post their clickbait. Forbes adds their reputation and the ads and then splits the profit with the “contributor”…

        • bobman@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I once had a college professor tell me forbes was ‘absolutely reliable.’

          That was a decade years ago, but still.

          • bemenaker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            Forbes used to be credible. Like so many, they gave up on making good content, because, it costs money to do so.

            • SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              It not just cost money. It’s easier to generate outrage and “interesting” articles when you can just make shit up (or at least distort facts), so bullshit gets more clicks and thus is more profitable!

      • braveone@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In this case you are wrong. This article is by Forbes Staff, not a contributor.

        Forbes uses one name to deliver two different products, one of which is an in house magazine.

          • fubo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think you mean “anti-Nazi slogan”. The “Nazis” here are the ones doing Nazi shit, like invading other countries, putting people in prison camps, etc.

          • PastaGorgonzola@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “God bless America” seems a more apt comparison. Seeing as “Sieg Heil” was meant to glorify Hitler, rather than inspire pride of the country. Besides that, comparing Ukraine to Nazi Germany seems a bit too “Russian propaganda” for my tastes.

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who out there would be dumb enough to think “Ukraini” would mean either “Sieg” or “Heil” and not just mean the the sovereign nation of Ukraine?

          • FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            It means Glory to Ukraine. Pretty much every military has something like it (for example, Hooah or Ooh-rah for the US Military (specifically the Army and the Marines). It’s also a national salute, which a lot of countries have.

          • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            which translates to “say hail” in english

            https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/hail

            Verb

            hail (third-person singular simple present hails, present participle hailing, simple past and past participle hailed)

            (transitive) To greet; give salutation to; salute.

            (transitive) To name; to designate; to call. quotations ▼

            He was hailed as a hero.
            

            The problem with the german WWII one isn’t as much the word as who they were hailing.

            i very much doubt the Ukrainian word has the same negative connotations as the german one.

    • Obinice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Conservatives like the Tories, who are like"fascist-lite", or conservatives like USA conservatives, who are full on “nazi level fascists”? 😅

      I think Forbes is scummy for many reasons and never liked them, you’ve given me another reason to dislike them.

          • madcaesar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because, just like FOX News we don’t want to support any of their shit.

            Just because there is one berry in the mountain of feces, we don’t need to go digging for it.

            Plenty of better news sources to support anyway.

    • heef@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I agree with the referencing a horrible twitter user in the article being a bad thing, but your stance on conservatives, especially your username, is very fascist in of itself.

      • Impassionata@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        is very fascist in of itself.

        No. It’s not fascist to have a firm and authoritative opinion. It is, perhaps, violent and authoritarian in outlook, but conservatives have just tolerated if not endorsed an insurrection under false pretenses and those conservatives have yet to kill the traitor responsible for it, so contemplation of violence is justified because this ‘cold civil war’ as Vivek called it is not going to end with that boomer criminal in power ever again.

    • Filipdaflippa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Are you suggesting there isn’t nazis in Ukraine’s armed forces? Take a look at the cemeteries for the soldiers, you will notice some weird flags flying.