They got called out on all their bullshit, in front of the staff they were trying to take advantage of.
They got called out on all their bullshit, in front of the staff they were trying to take advantage of.
Yeah, I hear you. Lots of things get said, but little gets done-- I can’t argue with that. But I’m looking for concrete examples because most of the goals and results people are expecting, from my perspective, are things that only get accomplished through legislation. Democrats have recently been focusing on voting rights. A solid voting rights bill would be a solid step toward tackling the issues you mentioned, but in June the most recent bill was voted against by all 50 Republican senators.
What are some examples of manipulation from the Democratic party that you are equating here?
Between the lines of “I don’t want to” reads “I have to”, which is easily disputed if said out loud.
It’s like… 2001 shareware shitpost flavored.
Take 'im away, toys.
Might be right but in my experience a lack of skill in conversing with AI is a much greater factor in determining it’s usefulness. It’s almost always going to defer to the user. It’s like when someone is dealing with tech support and they tell them to try turning it off and on again. If that really is the solution, and the user insists that it is not, CGPT is going to make something up just to appease the user’s request.
Users have to know that CGPT isn’t magic. How they behave affects how it behaves. Kind of like talking to actual people, which is what it’s essentially trying to simulate.
What goes better with crackers?