Brought to you by the Department of Erasing History.

        • girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          It might be that someone wanted to change something that was on a website before the archive could get to it too.

          • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            34
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            That’s a ridiculous amount of effort to go through to slow down a scraper for one site, especially when that site could just be… turned off.

            • Saik0A
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              6 months ago

              If you own the domain you can disable the crawler on it. And remove previous scrapes.

              • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Then it still makes no sense, as you being unable to take down the content means you also very likely can’t edit the content. I can’t think of a situation where you:

                1. Need content to not be scraped
                2. Need time to remove/edit that content
                3. Have access to do the above
                4. Don’t have access to pull the content immediately
                5. Have control of a large enough botnet to take down Internet Archive
                6. Don’t have a big enough botnet to take down the aforementioned content
                • Saik0A
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Well that’s my point… It doesn’t make sense because you can just go after the fact and make the request to take it all down.

                  You have to be stupidly paranoid and obscenely stupid to believe that a DDOS is the correct answer if this is the case.

                • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️@7.62x54r.ru
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  On an individual level, having a massive archive of everything you’ve ever posted isn’t always a good thing, especially when mentally ill people will quote mine a single post and then try to misuse it.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Well they made a bad job of it because you can’t do that with a DDOS attack. Basically it’s the same as picketing the entrance to a building. All you need is a lot of people anyone can do it at any time.

        Actually entering the building and manipulating contents it holds is much more difficult, as then you actually have to engage with the building security.

        A DDOS attack can never delete data.

        • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          A DDOS alone cannot delete data, but like your picketing analogy, if you can get in first, the picketing will keep out anyone looking to stop your interference.

    • xavier666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      81
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Modification of history is one of the most common tools of dictators

      • Nziom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        But they have back up to the entire thing am pretty sure any change would be detectable if a dictator is behind this then he’s extremely stupid

        • Agent641@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          If the internet archive goes offline we can just view a cached version of it at the internet archi OH NO!

          • Nziom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            I thought there back online was there any update on the issue?

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      6 months ago

      They’re storing proof of my fuck up which I fixed but if anyone looks it up I’m cooked