https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/24784-anus-function

Muscles, nerves and mucous membranes in your anus

It is though…

Vatican City issues it’s own passports. It is sovereign.

And none of what you said excuses them for having policies that are much more restrictive than the USA, just to turn around and “holier than thou” the USA on policies.

Being willing to host the platform that will rub manufacturers the wrong way and will absolutely net a lawsuit or two is worth giving some credit for.

The person who researches and identifies the key deserves some. The person who writes the guide to publish it on the site deserves some.

Everyone involved deserves credit for their part.

Right… That’s the point. They (the Holy See, and thus Vatican City)… Being squarely set in restrictions… is complaining when a country with MUCH LESS restrictions on citizenship acts…

If the Vatican Cities rules were applied to the USA today. It would be a literal shit show, and significantly worse.

That’s my point. He has no room to talk. He’s blowing hot air up everyone’s asses to make himself look better when he is significantly worse. The “old world” is de facto more restrictive, and Vatican City is significantly worse than that.

https://zenit.org/2024/08/29/vatican-citys-immigration-law-one-of-the-strictest-in-europe/

Rocks and glass houses. The Pope’s words on the matter is pointless based on the policies of the sovereign land he controls.

If you manage to be born in the Vatican City, you don’t get citizenship(citizenship of Vatican City is granted on jus officii, so you need to be appointed at the Vatican to have citizenship). And will be deported. This leaves you stateless which is a massive problem, such a massive problem, that the Italian government negotiated the problem away in the Lateran Treaty.

I haven’t bad faithed anything… You clearly don’t understand how hosting a service works, in the case of “thousands of users” 1000 active is a hard lowball.

You’ve clarified nothing. You constantly moved goalposts and pushed random “facts” like those statements changed anything about the original premise you presented and my response to it. You started with “THOUSANDS OF USERS”. Then backed down to 12 two posts later.

THOUSANDS OF USERS -> Okay so let’s take a case of 1000 active users…

UH UH, I didn’t say simultaneous!!! -> Good thing I only took a case of 1000 active users then… BTW we’re not even looking at server costs for processing, just raw bandwidth.

Uh Uh, What about 12 users!!! -> (we are here).

You need help dude. Nobody is coming after you. And nobody misrepresented you. You’re just completely out of your depth, which is okay. But don’t act like somebody is misrepresenting you, the world can read your responses.

So now you’ve backed down from “thousands of users” to a dozen?

If you have THOUSANDS OF USERS (your words)… you should probably at least plan for 1000 concurrents, probably more (remember you have to plan for peaks, not average).

You seem to be missing this repeatedly… I’m not sure how else to present it to you. You made the claim that a decent singular server should be able to host THOUSANDS (with an S… so multiple thousands.) I’m showing you that even if it’s just 1000 concurrents, you’re paying a heavy cost JUST for bandwidth… forget the server. You’re over your head if you think a single server is doing this shit.

I run a plex instance, I have 8gbps internet to my house. I could host probably 80-100 simultaneous streams on that bandwidth of raw blurays. My servers could not handle that load simultaneously (and they’re hooked up as 40gbps internally). If bandwidth is the easy side of this equation (it is)… and your assertions are already failing… Then you’re just plain wrong.

I do know how sentences work. I also know that paragraphs and posts sound be related to each other. Your sentences are not completely divorced from each other.

The point was that you’re claiming to do research on something just to turn around and say something that WILDLY wrong. This discredits any amount of research you would have done.

Doesn’t matter if you say simultaneously or not. You said THOUSANDS… I showed you just 1000. And this was ONLY looking at bandwidth. Not actual server costs.

by my research. A single server of sufficient power could easily serve thousands of users.

That’s some shitty research you’ve done then.

1000 users streaming something that’s 5mbps would be 5gbps.

5gbps isn’t common for consumers… and costs a lot in a datacenter (about 4k/month on the cheaper end).

Ask the admins to setup the NAT rule.

But yeah, ultimately it’s a pretty poor decision on Prusa’s part to make it hardcoded. I didn’t even realize my mk4 doesn’t allow manually setting the time. I wonder if anyone has brought it up on the firmware repo.

I have DHCP announcing the NTP server, I haven’t seen my prusa attempt to talk outside of my network. But I do see a boatload of IoT stuff ignore my local NTP all the time. Very frustrating.

There’s no other way to set the time on them.

Factually wrong. You can do a NAT rule to force it to whatever NTP you want. If you own the network, you can route the packets however you like.

Example from my opnsense config:

Nothing leaves my network on port 123 unless it’s my own timeserver serving a response to an external request. (I actually have a proper GPS-based time server, but nothing stops you from just having a normal linux host as a timeserver or something this way either).

I do the same thing with DNS. Force all port 53 and 853 traffic to my own DNS servers. And have a wide firewall block rule for any known DoH servers.

But the LE/GN cases are that Honey changed URLs and cost them the sale revenue, no?

https://www.cpmlegal.com/assets/htmldocuments/GamersNexus v. Paypal.pdf

a. Nationwide Class: All persons and entities in the United States who participated in an affiliate commission program with a United States eCommerce merchant and had commissions diverted to PayPal as a result of Honey.

So yes, they’re suing on behalf of creators.

But they’re using logic of what is promised/advertised to users… alongside the creator side of it all.

12. Consumers download the PayPal Honey browser extension under the promise that Honey will search the web for the best coupons to ensure consumers pay the lowest prices when checking out with eCommerce merchants […] After this affiliate network partnership is established, on information and belief, Honey deliberately withholds higher-value coupons, directly contradicting Honey’s promise to consumers.

Which we know is inaccurate at this point and honey is lying. Most of the rest will come out in discovery if Honey wants to fight it. And I think it’s safe to say that anything that comes out in discovery will simply hang honey even more than we already know.

Mastodon and Lemmy are the same fediverse… You don’t need to have an account on both to communicate between them…

And just like Lemmy, you can self-host your own Mastodon as well. No need to choose… I technically run both. But I like lemmy much more than mastodon personally.

No, not the entire state… It’s just that NYC has so much power it can legislate all sorts of shit the rest of the state doesn’t necessarily want.

I grew up in NY… close enough to the city that I’ve spent considerable time there, but far enough away that I wasn’t in the metro area.

Every year new shit was legislated that us non-city folk just didn’t understand what the fuck was going on.

Eh, Cheetos are junk food though… empty calories that make people fat (I actually really dislike normal cheetos… but like crunchy cheetos). There is clearly a negative connotation here… The most you get from Winnie the Pooh is that he’s often naive to stuff, but that only makes him more warm and loving… Which makes it all the more stupid that Xi Jingping would take offense.

I wouldn’t know. I’ve never been on that platform.

What’s funny is how Winnie the Pooh is literally nothing but positive. lovable bear. yet somehow its offensive.

LMFAO. This is your takeaway if race is ALL you can see.

It could never apply to ad blockers. You install an ad blocker knowing that it will block stuff… and explicitly WANTING it to do so.

Nobody installed honey knowing that it was manipulating cookies and stuff. The normal layperson who installs it will just think “It’s just chucking in coupon codes into that box!”…

One is predicated on a lie of omission… the other is literally what the user wants. There’s a huge difference…

Can you post winnie the xi jingping on there?

Or is that an insta-ban like every other chinese-based platform?