• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    1 year ago

    “We’ve ignored all the meaningful terms you were searching for. Now here’s a bunch of pinterest and quora spam.”

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Half the time I look at a website or article it is just AI generated crap anyway. Oh you want a product review? Here are a half dozen articles that have summarised the Amazon reviews of an item, with no first hand experience.

    • DrMango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google “Best vacuum cleaner”

      Top 6 hits: “We evaluated the 5 brands that paid us the most and found that they all suck up your dirt. We can’t really speak ill of any of them because this is an ad and we signed a contract. Please use our embedded links so we can have more money.”

      • Cenzorrll@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s worse is most of what comes up isn’t even a hands on review, it’s literally someone doing what I just did, which is type “vacuum cleaner” into Amazon and see what came up. Then they give it reviews based on the bullshit in the description.

        I want a review from someone who sees these everyday and has a deep hatred of every vacuum in existence. He’s the one who knows that such and such used to be good until they replaced this part with plastic because they have a new CEO, and now it’s no better than a dirt devil.

        At least with vacuums however, there’s a few guys out there with carpet swathes, children, and dogs at home that get to take vacuums from work and do youtube tests with them. Unfortunately they usually don’t try to game the algorithm so they’re pretty deep in there.

  • Saneless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Search engine protocol:

    Ignore first few results (ads)

    Ignore next few results (bullshit spam comparison farms)

    Ignore really annoying site you think is ok but is a usability nightmare

    Ignore subsection of reddit links

    Find 0-1 useful links on first page

    Regret

  • Blapoo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Once AI is handling search for us, many may never learn the concept of “search term”

    • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      “AI” is already handling the search for you. The big search engines are probably the first mass scale adopters of machine learning.

      And they have lost the war with SEO spam to a hilarious extent. What makes you think the same won’t happen with chat bot AIs? Bad actors (including PR agencies) will inevitably figure out where and how to spam comments in order to bias the AI models in favor of their agendas or products.

      If the data they consume is filled with something like “fossil fuels don’t cause global warming because XYZ”, the chat bots will repeat it. They don’t have the capacity to reason.

      There hasn’t been a reason to flood the internet with low effort spam because it’s easily detected by humans who read it. But the ML algorithms will be a lot easier to trick.

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can already outsource a lot of this to Bing. If you need to know the right temperature for making french fries, you can google a bunch of “recipes” (AKA life story of the author + history + vacation photos + cooking instructions) read them through and… actually better make some coffee while you’re at it because this is going to take a while. Anyway, the other option is to ask: “Hey Bing, I’m making french fries, but I don’t know how hot the oven should be.”

      Spoiler: 220 °C

      The scary thing is, what happens when people start doing this for more important things, such as what to do if your child has swallowed something or how to parallel park your car.

      • Barbarian772@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        200 or 220, depends on if you are using a convection oven. But that’s beside the point, I really hope AI finally kills SEO.

        • backseat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m making french fries, but I don’t know how hot the oven should be.

          Contents:

          • What French fries are
          • Why you might want some
          • The dangers of French fries
          • Where to buy French fries
          • Ways of preparing French fries
          • Other names for French fries

          And so on.

        • KluEvo@wirebase.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oven cooked french fries are a thing, and have a surprisingly high popularity

          • Monkeyhog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Doesn’t the very nature of being fries, require them to be fried? Otherwise, they’re baked potato sticks.

      • Saneless@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Until they’re sponsored

        “I realize you seem frustrated from my responses. Nature’s Choice has a fantastic Stress Reducing gummy available at your local CVS”

        • ohlaph@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, the gentle product hints at first will be driving people away quicker than a Monstered up Uber driver.

    • Anamana@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      True but they will learn the concpet ‘inefficency increases individual profits’. Google has been getting worse and so will AI search eventually.

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the same idea I think, figuring out how to describe what you mean or phrase the question the right way to get the right kind of results.

  • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is especially frustrating when trying to find parts for vehicles or machinery. Used to, one could search for something like “1988 Suzuki Samurai Oil Filter” and get the answer for all the common filter brands. But now all you get is links to an auto parts website, where you have to use their shitty search function and hope they have what you need.

    • Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know your pain, I’ve skipped it entirely and always go for the part number. There are great resources for BMWs with sites like realoem.com, but what about other manufacturers?

    • such_fifty_bucks@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Often you’ll find a ‘print recipe’ button somewhere near the top of the page. Click on that, it’ll take you to what you’re looking for without all of the crap nobody cares about.

      • Trofont@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        100% what I do. Print to pdf and then never go to the site, because they’re so over loaded with ads and pictures that will load and cause the page to bounce around.

        • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Firefox+AdNauseam

          Watching the numbers on each page go up is entertainment enough. Best part is that it stops the ad popping in the background so your page rarely jumps

            • such_fifty_bucks@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              AdNauseam integrates with UBO, so you’d get both. Basically, it virtualizes clicks on ads so ad sellers get charged for the click but it’s all hidden in the background from you.

              That said, I kinda have mixed feelings about it. Ad clicks will help support sites you like, so even if you’re blocking ads you’re still getting ‘served’ and ‘interacting’ with them. On the other hand, it tells sites 'hey all these ads you’re serving aren’t making your website shitty and unusable (but they generally are) so keep it up! And it tells ad agencies and the industry ‘oh yeah we sure love clicking ads keep slapping them in my face at every corner’. And if ad buyers are realizing their clicks are all ghost clicks, they’ll stop buying ad space. Which just means shittier lowest common denominator ads in more places.

      • Chocrates@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I despise that every fucking recipe is a blog post. I don’t care that little Becky loved this soup, I just want to know how much salt I should add.

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The horrible reality is that Bing has actually become a competitor to Google, simply by Google getting worse and worse. Microsoft used to be the main bad guy, but these days they practically seem benign compared to the others. Not open source like you’re saying, of course.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The infrastructure to crawl, store, and serve search results to billions of users is phenomenally expensive. A government might fund it (which comes with its own concerns), but a non-profit will struggle to compete.

    • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wikipedia probably has the resources to do it, wikisearch. Somebody talk them into it. But yeah, modern search engines, pretty amazing the ones from two decades ago actually worked better.

    • Chocrates@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This could be interesting. The infrastructure required to scrape the internet though is going to be so daunting. Google got to build it up slowly as the internet got bigger. Bing is backed by a huge corporation that already has data centers. A new non profit player is going to take a huge coordinated effort.

      • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know P2P had become a dead buzzword, but what if people dedicated a portion of their computers to assisting an open search engine.

        I would wait 30s for accurate results. It could also piggyback on a search aggregator.

    • Jocker@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hmm… Interesting… That would be great… If only something like that exists now!

      • SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yacy exists but it’s bad enough that it’s one of the few options I don’t self host.

  • Annoyed_Crabby@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Tfw you searched something and the top10 answer is mostly copied homework without much variation, and then the best one is from reddit.

    • markr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Product information search is now totally useless. I used to be able to use a part number to find a manual, now it is just scammers Amazon and eBay.

      YouTube videos were once good sources for DIY, now the useful shit is buried behind product placement bullshitters.

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or websites showing the first page of a manual and requiring payment if you want to see the rest.

    • Misconduct@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s been pissing me off for years now is googling a specific company and getting a wall of advertisements for their competitors first. So. Dirty.

  • Captain_Shakespeare@reddthat.com
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I swear sometimes it feels like a superpower to have grown up in the 90s and learned the ground rules for multiple OSes, search tools, and file systems - the descendants of which are nearly all still in use today.

    I defer of course to any oldheads who can still bang out a long .bat file or compile and configure Linux; I just mean it’s a very useful quirk of the era that skills learned on windows 3.1 or OSX are still broadly applicable, even in fields where ‘using the computer’ is a minor task of one’s workday.

    • Natal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree so much. It feels like I “understand” how a computer talks and interacts as opposed to most people I work with just learn processes by heart and have no clue what to do once their process breaks.

    • DrQuint@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Whenever you try to get an answer to something like “What movie was the Be Like Water line from” and you can NOT find anything other than a bunch of articles with tons of paragraphs wasting your time - that’s the SEO spam tactics. Those articles chose words that made themselves easier to be indexed by Google, but don’t actually want to answer that question.

      And yes. I literally looked this up this week.

      I still don’t fucking know if it came from Enter the Dragon or some other short series. I just gave up. Google has enshitified news articles on the internet and has to seriously consider retraining their algorithm to negatively impact shit like that.

    • balance_sheet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tactics to get more visible to the search engines. Optimizing the website to the search engines.

      It’s something we all must do to make a nice, visited websites. It’s also something that spammers got so good that literally everything you search is basically ¾ ads at this point.

  • Raglesnarf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    my lil trick is I’d just add “Reddit” after most searches to find others in a similar situation or maybe a solution

    • berrodeguarana@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      2 months ago that was fine.

      Now I don’t have an app for that, the website on my mobile doesn’t open my search and instead tells me to download the official Reddit app, or the subs are nsfw or private.

      Sigh, so much for easy answers at a type of the finger :(

      • 𝑔𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑥𝑖@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not that I’m recommending anyone give reddit any more traffic or leverage, but I’ve been using Stealth app at the recommendation of someone else on here. It’s downloadable through f-droid and specifically is meant to keep you anonymous and avoid any trackers and other trash normally found when opening reddit links. You can’t even log into an account. I use it on the rare moments I’m looking for stuff on there, it makes me feel a bit better about it.

        • berrodeguarana@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Solid advice m8, I downloaded that 1. Funny thing that the 1st thing I saw on the app once I entered was a message saying “in a few weeks Stealth will end due to end of free API”. Sigh, these last months all these huge internet companies are making such a mess.

    • pitl@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Up until the API debacle, that was my solution too. Now even that doesn’t work. It’s so bizarrely hard to look something up on the internet now.

      • dingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Does this work any better than DuckDuckGo. People praise DDG, but imo it’s results are pretty shit and I could never end to sticking with it. It can’t even get basic quoted text syntax correct.

      • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh fuck man, that’s a great find! Thank you for sharing that. It’s actually providing really substantiative results which I haven’t seen from Google for at least 5 years.

        I have definitely bookmarked that website, even though I use duck duck go I will probably use that as an alternate now.

        Another good search engine that’s less useful for searches but for providing information is of course Wolfram alpha

    • Littleborat@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe that does work again after the thing with subreddits going nsfw has been somewhat resolved but not sure. It was my thing too. I heard good things about bing of all places. In general search just got worse over the last 5-6 years.

      • Sparky678348@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        People talk about Bing and duck duck go like they’re good replacements, and I’ve given them honest good faith tries.

        I always switch my search engine back to Google after simply not getting the results I’m looking for

        • jmanjones@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          you can use Google or Bing from duckduckgo using !bangs. g! (for google) or b! (for bing) then whatever you are searching for. I use g! all the time for non privacy related things. and since duckduckgo doesn’t use trackers and all that the results can be terrible so sometimes I just resort to using g!

          • dingus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Using DuckDuckGo to search through Google seems pretty damn pointless if you ask me. If the search engine is shit and I am just roundabout using Google then why even bother?

            I know you said the thing about trackers, but a lot of us don’t really care about that. If the end result is just using Google anyway then I’d rather just start with Google and not use another site to use Google.

      • zettajon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I used Bing chat to plan my itinerary for my next vacation. These LLMs are the new best way to search, although the recent stories of their results becoming worse doesn’t bode well

  • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s actually a lot of theory and early work out there on the topic of federated search. While existing search aggregators like Searx and YaCY certainly qualify as federated, search infrastructure built from the ground up with decentralization in mind would look very different. All that to say this isn’t necessarily the end of the line.