• Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    It must be all the seafood they eat. Or maybe it’s that glass of rum after each meal. Maybe smoing pure tobacco leaf in cigars also helps extend your lifespan as it doesn’t contain the extra chemicals they use in cigarettes.

    No it’s the free healthcare.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      They don’t just have free Healthcare, they have one of the highest doctor to patient ratios in the world. It’s amazing what they’ve accomplished despite how much they’ve been screwed by sanctions. Some dumb people point to Cuba as a failure of communism, but it’s one of the greatest success stories if anything.

    • rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’d be curious to see their obesity rates, as well. The USA has an enormously toxic relationship with food. Sugar is innately addictive and we’ve subsidized its production with the federal corn subsidy, which is part of the reason high fructose corn syrup is in practically everything. I’d be surprised if Cubans were anywhere near as physically unhealthy as the average American.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve been to Cuba and I gotta admit that Cubans were generally pretty skinny. The only few overweight people I’ve seen were mostly older people in their 50’s-60’s.

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    A lot of Medium posts are soft-paywalled nowadays: http://archive.today/pgjoQ

    Reagan designated Cuba a state sponsor of terrorism, Obama removed it, Trump re-designated it, and Biden has done nothing but vote against UN resolutions calling for the end of the embargo, as recently as four months ago.

    The United Nations General Assembly has passed a resolution every year since 1992 demanding the end of the US economic embargo on Cuba, with the US and Israel being the only nations to consistently vote against the resolutions.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 months ago

    US government would say that Cuban socialism is a failure like they haven’t spent decades trying to force it to fail.

    Why then don’t they lift the sanctions and prove beyond doubt that socialism hurts the Cuban people? Maybe they fear a prosperous Cuba, a successful socialist country right on their doorstep that would make voting Americans take notice.

    • VARXBLE@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The US government has pretty much admitted that’s the case, and has been the direct goal of constantly trying to tear down (and assassinate) Castro and have Cuba fail since the 1950s.

      EDIT: I’m saying the US has been seething for decades because Cuba has managed to exist as a socialist country right next door, and that’s bad for the capitalist propaganda that socialism bad

    • MajorSauce@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Lift the sanctions, but please keep prohibiting US American tourism. This is one of the few “close by” (for me in Quebec) vacation place that still has a different vibe.

  • Fishroot [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 months ago

    yeah but they can’t have junkfood and plastic toys, it’s literally totalitarianism.

    I remember when Vice ran a documentary about some losers in Cuba trying to give themselves AIDS as a sign of protest against the government by bogging down the health system.

  • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 months ago

    Not sure why Cuba is singled out but like most countries with decent healthcare have a higher life expectancy than the US.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Probably because stark contrast between the richest country on Earth treating its people like shit, and country which is harshly embargoed, attacked and sabotaged by it for over 60 years and still having better healthcare. Key difference: capitalism vs socialism. For full picture a comparable, not embargoed and capitalist country should be thrown into comparison, Haiti for example.

      • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Oh, it seems other sources say differently and the article has no source so I have no idea where it’s from. I wouldn’t have know if I didn’t start looking at life expectancy in other countries.

        According to World Bank Group from 2021 it seems Cuba is ranked 82th with 73.68 years in life expectancy while the US is 59th with 76.33 years.

        Haiti is like 169th with 63.19 years but another comparable nation Costa Rica is 45th with 80.3 years.

        United Nations data is only different by less than 0.5 years but ranks the US higher.

        How the US treats it’s citizens is shitty and I like how Cuba promotes coops but let’s not spread misinformation.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    Americans saying that Canadians go to the states for healthcare is projection for the fact they all go to Cuba.

  • Saik0A
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Sounds like it’s a good thing the embargo is in place then… Imagine all the unhealthy shit they could lower their life expectancy with if they got it from the USA.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Even in North Corea (as say, if you are not against little Kim) is higher than in the EEUU, because in the EEUU if you got ill without money you are death.

      • Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Faux pas of a Spanish speaker, sorry, it certainly means Amerika (Estados Unidos, doble letters for the plurals, literally EEUU=US)

        • JohnDoe@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ah ty, I’m learning spanish, is it supposed to be like the word “estadonidense”? i’m learning spanish from south america if that means anything in like word usage

          • spinguin@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            “Estadounidense” is the demonym–so what you would call something from the US (the English equivalent would be American, possibly Yankee [although that has its own Spanish word, “yanqui”]). Other demonyms would be salvadoreño for Salvadorean, mexicano for Mexican, venezolano for Venezuelan, etc.

            So, to answer your question: yes, the words are related; someone from los Estados Unidos (EEUU) would be estadounidense.

            Edit to clarify:

            Strictly speaking, the word “demonym” refers to people, but in the case of “estadounidense” it can refer to things and people. From English Wikipedia:

            “Often, demonyms are the same as the adjectival form of the place, e.g. Egyptian, Japanese, or Greek. However, they are not necessarily the same, as exemplified by Spanish instead of Spaniard or British instead of Briton.”

            • JohnDoe@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              huh, thanks for sharing! i learned something!

              i think demon every time i read demonym and i’ll never not see it

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I need some of whatever you’re smoking. You should probably look up the relevant data before making dumb claims like this.

  • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Lots of people understandably jump to the idea of “free healthcare” when trying to understand this phenomenon. While that is somewhat correct, there is lot more that needs to be done to achieve what Cuba has in terms of public health. The mode and amount of payment by patients is just one aspect of it. They also have train doctors of the appropriate quality and in the adquate quantity. Then they have to invest in the infrastructure and products that the health system needs which they manage despite crippling sanctions. There are a ton of other things as well, like ensuring that the rural areas have access to clinics and doctors which is one of the biggest of the countless failings of the Indian medical system.

    I guess that the point I am trying to make is that you need a government that gives a shit about the people and considers them people rather than expendable workhorses for the owning class. Cuba, emerging out of a people’s revolution, had this checked off. I bring this up because I feel even if Bernie had won the nomination and presidency he would have been able to only make marginal improvements to the American condition with his promise of a single-payer healthcare system which tackles only one small aspect of a deeply rotten healthcare system that the USA has. If he was somehow able to make any noticeable improvement without getting assassinated, they would be rolled back by whatever administration followed his kinda like how UK’s NSA is slowly being strangulated as we speak.

    You cannot have “free as in free speech” healthcare when the reigns of power are held by a wealthy minority.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Exactly, any actual freedom or democracy is only possible when the means of production are publicly owned. Only then can resources and labour be directed in a way that benefits majority of the people. It’s impossible to have any meaningful freedoms when a handful of oligarchs runs the economy.

  • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    Medium articles with zero sources for their claims are what count as news now?