Amazon is the most prominent company to use the high court’s June ruling that a Christian web designer was free to refuse to design sites for gay weddings.

Amazon.com’s Whole Foods Market doesn’t want to be forced to let workers wear “Black Lives Matter” masks and is pointing to the recent US Supreme Court ruling permitting a business owner to refuse services to same-sex couples to get federal regulators to back off.

National Labor Relations Board prosecutors have accused the grocer of stifling worker rights by banning staff from wearing BLM masks or pins on the job. The company countered in a filing that its own rights are being violated if it’s forced to allow BLM slogans to be worn with Whole Foods uniforms.

Amazon is the most prominent company to use the high court’s June ruling that a Christian web designer was free to refuse to design sites for gay weddings, saying the case “provides a clear roadmap” to throw out the NLRB’s complaint.

The dispute is one of several in which labor board officials are considering what counts as legally-protected, work-related communication and activism on the job.

    • Saik0AEnglish
      41·
      1 year ago

      Yup, more ad hominem. You know that reflects on you right?

      I have plenty of things that I like. I also know that there’s a time and place for it. While I’m working isn’t either. It’s just called common decency.

        • Saik0AEnglish
          22·
          1 year ago

          I don’t believe that adhering to a dress policy is societal oppression. Period. But that seems to be way over your head. If you believe that you NEED the ability to wear that stuff… get a job that allows it. It’s as simple as that. It’s the ultimate freedom.

            • Saik0AEnglish
              32·
              1 year ago

              What if you’re a black teen and the only job you can get is at Whole Foods?

              Then don’t piss off the only employer in your area? That’s not Whole Foods [or anyone elses really] problem.

              Then your boss tells you not to acknowledge [BLM, please don’t conflate the scenario here]

              No. The policy is NO branding other than whole foods. This isn’t targeted at anyone in particular. If you believe that whole foods is treating you poorly then you leave the job. That’s it.

              You’re so up you’re own ass, you’re unable to sympathize with any marginalized group

              You’re so up your own that you didn’t even stop to realize that I might be part of those groups myself the funny part is my group was treated worse for literally hundreds of years longer but you do you. You’re making assumptions without realizing that this has nothing to do with any of what your talking about. It’s literally just a bog standard basic dress code, not an anti-BLM plot.

                • Saik0AEnglish
                  2·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s literally not. If you insert any other argument then you’re wrong.

                  https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-dismisses-whole-foods-workers-lawsuit-over-black-lives-matter-masks-2023-01-23/

                  “The evidence demonstrates only that Whole Foods did not strenuously enforce the dress code policy until mid-2020, and that when it increased enforcement, it did so uniformly,” Burroughs wrote in a 28-page decision.

                  You can literally read the full decision from the judge if you like. If you can find evidence that Whole Foods was acting against the employees unfairly, then I’m sure the plaintiffs lawyers would like to hire you on as a partner in their firm.

                • Saik0AEnglish
                  3·
                  1 year ago

                  Not even close. I’m part of a marginalized group, but don’t make it my whole identity. I came from immigrant parents, am first generation American, worked hard to get where I am and am raising up those around me as well. You know what doesn’t help? Wearing a fucking pin or logo.