According to Hans-Kristian Arntzen, a prominent open-source developer working on Vkd3d, a DirectX 12 to Vulkan translation layer, Starfield is not interacting properly with graphics card drivers.

  • aksdb@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Evolution isn’t wrong. It’s not like Unreal Engine gets rewritten from scratch for each major version.

    • Virkkunen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Exactly, people forget that most of the well known engines today are as old or older than Creation Engine, they’re all patched/upgraded as it fits, though Creation Engine has no apparent version numbers and it’s made by Bethesda so you get free internet points and a feeling of superiority for hating on the popular thing.

      If you took these folks opinions as truth you’d think Bethesda games are massive flops that barely sell 10 copies and are a study case on how not to develop a game, but the real world is very different from the echo chamber…

      • TheOnlyMego@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh don’t get me wrong, Bethesda games are generally great (with notable exceptions like Fallout 76), and do phenomenally well in sales. However, dismissing any and all criticism of the games’ numerous flaws (including glitches which often carry over between subsequent titles, like clipping through collision boxes and falling through maps) is willful ignorance at its finest. Every Bethesda game has performance issues and game-breaking bugs, and there was no reason to expect Starfield to be any different in that regard.

      • all-knight-party@kbin.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        It boggles my mind how many things people say about this game that are patently untrue, obviously extremely biased against the game/studio, or make it seem like this game killed their dog.

        The game has issues, for sure, some things like the nonexistent city/building local map systems are indefensible, but damn dude, I wish people would just try to have mature discussions with realistic expectations about it instead of whatever this shit show is that we call “gaming discussions”

          • all-knight-party@kbin.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            Sure, if the game doesn’t appeal to you for that value, then there will be eventual sales. It won’t be worth that amount to everyone. Doesn’t really excuse the overly emotional criticism, or even the overly emotional defense from others. It’s a good game. A true value judgment from there will be harder and more tied to individual tastes.

        • Virkkunen@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Gamers will never be mature or have realistic expectations. They cannot fathom that people are enjoying a thing they don’t like, and they’re very vocal about it, it’s petty, really.

          I try to move myself off of these discussions but there’s always one comment that drags me down the well because it’s so blatantly untrue, but it’s miserable. Lemmy, kbin and Reddit are overly negative places where it seems the goal is to get everyone mad with terrible takes.

          People need to remember that opinions aren’t factsz and learn to shut the fuck up and let people enjoy things.

          • stonedemoman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Gamers will never be mature or have realistic expectations. They cannot fathom that people are enjoying a thing they don’t like, and they’re very vocal about it, it’s petty, really.

            You want people to have more mature discussions but then disavow any nuance in the same breath. Do you not see how this is a contradiction?

      • aksdb@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Which is, literally, not every major version. I didn’t say “all Unreal Engine versions are evolutionary steps over their predecessors”, I said “they don’t get rewritten from scratch for each major version”.

        Someone else also brought up the Quake engine, which has even more evolutionary steps; even with forks like the Source engine.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s not really a good metaphor for software.

      Or maybe it is if you meant how many weird and inefficient things living creatures have because it was good enough. Think about that the next time you accidentally choke on nothing

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      You can only reinvent the Bounding Box once. Epic is a better steward of technical debt. Bethesda doesn’t know what that is.

      • sheogorath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        But with the optimization quality of current UE 5 games I’m quite pessimistic about the current trend of game development.

    • Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Evolution frequently discards baggage.

      Bethesda just keep piling shit on top without doing any of the necessary groundwork to make it run well.