• Isoprenoid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not the ‘-isms’, my guy.

      It’s people. Flawed beings making and interacting with flawed systems.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        It takes people to enact policies around the -isms and to make the -isms themselves, so I dont really see the logic here.

        • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It takes people to enact policies around the -isms and to make the -isms themselves

          The OP said “…-ism is the real cancer upon society”. I was pointing out that people are the real cancer of society. It doesn’t matter what “-ism” you want to stand behind, there will always be issues because humanity is fundamentally broken.

          • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            humanity is fundamentally broken

            I’d argue that humanity and an -ism aren’t that different in this context – arbitrary linguistic form aside, they both refer to abstract collectives.

            But ultimately, I still don’t see the logic in separating humanity from the systems it created and uses. Fixing one fixes the other, in bilateral fashion.