• Isoprenoid@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not the ‘-isms’, my guy.

    It’s people. Flawed beings making and interacting with flawed systems.

    • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      It takes people to enact policies around the -isms and to make the -isms themselves, so I dont really see the logic here.

      • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It takes people to enact policies around the -isms and to make the -isms themselves

        The OP said “…-ism is the real cancer upon society”. I was pointing out that people are the real cancer of society. It doesn’t matter what “-ism” you want to stand behind, there will always be issues because humanity is fundamentally broken.

        • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          humanity is fundamentally broken

          I’d argue that humanity and an -ism aren’t that different in this context – arbitrary linguistic form aside, they both refer to abstract collectives.

          But ultimately, I still don’t see the logic in separating humanity from the systems it created and uses. Fixing one fixes the other, in bilateral fashion.