Other images displayed by Trump during meeting with South African president Cyril Ramaphosa were false or misleading

The evidence of supposed mass killings of white South Africans presented by Donald Trump in a tense White House meeting on Wednesday were in some cases images from the Democratic Republic of Congo, while footage shown during the meeting was falsely portrayed as depicting “burial sites”.

“These are all white farmers that are being buried,” said Trump, holding up a print-out of an article accompanied by a picture during the contentious Oval Office meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa.

The picture accompanying the article was in fact a screengrab of a video published by Reuters on 3 February and subsequently verified by the news agency’s fact check team, showing humanitarian workers lifting body bags in the Congolese city of Goma. The image was pulled from Reuters footage shot after deadly battles with Rwanda-backed M23 rebels.

  • Charlxmagne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    To choose SA of all places for this particular agenda has to be the most ironic thing I’ve heard in a while 🤦‍♂️ quite brave asw considering Musk’s family history

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Ramaphosa was right to ask “I’d like to know where that is”, when the “evidence” was shown to him live.

    Other world leaders should be prepared to challenge Trump right to his face when he fabricates lies like this in those pathetic ambush attempts.

  • Omega@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    A lot of really distateful comments here, genuinely surprised they weren’t deleted by mods

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      How does that happen? Who goes “text text text, blah blah blah, now I need a specific flag, let’s definitely type ‘flag’ and tediously look for the right one, because typing [country name] would be too easy”? I get that they look VERY similar and I couldn’t tell you which one is which if they’re side-by-side but that doesn’t fucking matter if you simply ask your keyboard for the country! Gaaaaaawddddddd.

      Romania: 🇷🇴 Chad: 🇹🇩

      Same for stereotypical USians going “yeeeeah 🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷”

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Legit identical on my phone.

        Also I use the Liberia flag ironically all the time. It’s fun to see who notices.

  • RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I don’t think anybody in our federal government that’s in charge of anything has any good intentions at all at this point

  • anarchyrabbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Also doesn’t mean that the radical party EFF lead by Julius Malema (also known as Cunt) does not sing Kill the Boer at the rallies. Boer is Afrikaans for a farmer, it is also common slang for a white Afrikaner. If you think that is ok to do, you can fuck right off.

  • anarchyrabbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Doesn’t mean that we don’t have a violence issue in South Africa. Our killing stats are on par with countries at war. Think about that for a minute

    • Distractor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The one was a picture of a large number of crosses which Trump said was a burial site for 1000s of white farmers, when it was in fact a memorial following the death of 2 farmers. The memorial was intended to represent all farm deaths of all races. Farm deaths are an issue but the victims are of all races - they kill the farmers, their families and the workers.

      There was a video of a political leader singing a song that translates to “Kill the Boer” i.e. kill the white Afrikaans farmer. This video is: a) more than a decade old, b) from a rally of a minority opposition party i.e. not the political party of the people Trump was meeting, c) from a political party that has been losing votes in recent elections, led by someone who was expelled from the ruling party, d) is of a historic protest song from the apartheid era i.e. more than 30 years ago.

      This video resulted in a court case, where the court concluded that a “reasonably well-informed person” would understand that when a protest song is sung “even by politicians, the words are not meant to be understood literally, nor is the gesture of shooting to be understood as a call to arms or violence.”

      This video was a big deal at the time but it’s not current, not representative of the government’s view, and the person depicted in it is increasingly being sidelined in South African politics.

      • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        This question really shouldn’t be that hard to answer. Here’s the video that was shown at the Whitehouse: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLDl3mblm-c

        Video of the full meeting (I set the link to skip ahead to the part where the TV is brought in) if you want to see President Cyril Ramaphosa’s reaction to it: https://odysee.com/@NTD:2/live-trump-holds-bilateral-meeting-2:5?t=1313

        Besides the video of the crosses along the road, there are video clips of the Economic Freedom Fighter’s leader, Julius Malema calling for a bloody revolution as well as chanting with large crowds to “kill the Boer” (white man/farmer).

        There are no timestamps/locations for any of the video clips, but it looks like this guy founded the Economic Freedom Fighters back in 2013.

        Edit: typo

        • parpol@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          6 hours ago

          So far only one of them appeared to be from congo. What about the rest? Are we going to throw it all out because one was from Congo, and because a memorial mistaken for a burial site (literally makes no difference)

          • warbond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 hours ago

            It’s a government official making a claim based on easily verifiable bad evidence, so if the whole thing wasn’t suspect before, it most certainly is now, right? Why should we give the benefit of the doubt? Not only has the administration not earned that right, they’ve shown over and over again that they don’t extend that benefit to anyone else.

            It fucking amazes me that we don’t hold our leaders to a higher standard, and it worries me that people don’t seem to want to.

            • parpol@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              3 hours ago

              If it is easily verifiable, then how about we verify it right now? So what about those other cases not from Congo?

              Why should we give the benefit of the doubt?

              Because people are dead, and it is the choice between “ingore” or “start and investigation”

              I agree trump is a hack, but I want to know about those other cases.

              • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Im asking you which you’re talking about. Everyone else already knows the answer.

                • parpol@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  14
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  “The evidence of supposed mass killings of white South Africans presented by Donald Trump in a tense White House meeting on Wednesday were in some cases images from the Democratic Republic of Congo, while footage shown during the meeting was falsely portrayed as depicting “burial sites”.”

                  “In some cases” means less than a majorty of the cases. We’re talking about the rest. Do you and “everyone else” know something about these other ones we don’t?