Ideally one that can use more than one disk so that i can expand it later when i can. Have some minimal experience with Synology since there’s one at work and i have interacted with it a couple times and like the interface, but am not married to any brand as long as it works.

Located in EU if it makes any difference.

  • sproink@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Buy the cheapest old computer on your equivalent of Craigslist and install TrueNAS. If you want to use a lot of drives, make sure there are enough SATA connenctions on the motherboard.

    • Fauxreigner@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can also put an LSI SAS raid controller card flashed into IT into a PCI slot and use SAS to SATA cables. Can easily find them used on ebay for reasonable prices. And if you really grow your server, you can transition those SAS ports to point to a JBOD array with SAS ports, although that takes you from “cheap” to “cheap when compared to buying new.”

      I’m also a fan of Unraid since it makes expanding the array much easier, but you have to pay for it, and it’s designed with the assumption that the only thing you’re doing on the bare metal is storage, and everything else is either containerized or in a VM.

      Edit to add: As mentioned in the comments below (thanks u/[email protected]) it’s usually preferable to use software RAID, not hardware RAID, unless you know for sure you need that kind of performance, and if you’re asking about a cheap NAS you don’t. Flashing LSI raid controllers over to IT mode makes them pass through any attached discs, so it’s an easy way to add SATA ports when you’re running out of them on the mainboard.

      • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unless you have some really high throughput needs, or are putting it in a real weak computer, I recommend software raid like zfs. No need for a real raid controller unless you just need additional sata ports. Heck, even synologys prefer software RAID these days and they have atom or arm processors.

  • segfault@waveform.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use a Raspberry Pi 4B with a USB 3 JBOD 4-bay disk enclosure, with the disks in a ZFS pool, and it has been working great for my needs.

  • Goronmon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I ended up going with a smaller Synology as it was actually replacing a RaspberryPi + External drive setup that was failing.

    At the end of the day, the Synology was much more expensive, but for me it was worth the trade-off to have a mostly plug and play setup. I can easily move files around in a GUI. I can setup torrents, even configure it to use a VPN and it all takes minutes instead of researching configurations and managing daemons and processes like I had to do previously.

    Edit: Also, don’t forget to take into account power consumption when reviewing options. There can be a big difference between running an old desktop 24/7 as a NAS versus a Raspberry Pi.

  • SomeGuyNamedPaul@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been running a QNAP TS-435UeX and it checks all the boxes coming in with a mountain of hardware and capability for cheap. Dual 10 GB SFP+ ports, dual SSD slots for raided read write acceleration, user upgradeable memory. It does a lot of stuff and it’s an appliance so all the building out and troubleshooting crap is done for you, you just do what you want to do and be productive. The onboard encryption engine can fill the bandwidth of those SFP+ ports even if they’re bonded. 4 drive bays, but you can also add another 12 via a couple of different sized expansion boxes.

    It’s a 1U so the fans are kinda small, therefore it’s a bit noisy. The desktop version should be alright though.

  • Piatro@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve spent entirely too long in the last week or so researching this. You either go cheap but DIY, or expensive but prebuilt. That’s not to say that a DIY is always cheaper than a prebuilt, you can go absolutely nuts if you want, but the performance and spec will always be better for the money going DIY. Hot swap drawers are over-rated as you’ll maybe use them once a year if that. I can’t recommend any specific prebuilt because I haven’t used any and am waiting for parts for my DIY build.

  • [email protected]@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really any PC could be made into a NAS. If you have any old PC laying around you can install Linux to it, and then set up disk shares. I’m assuming you mean an appliance like NAS and honestly the only one I know of, but never used, is Synology.

    • Domiku@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Lenovo ThinkCentre computers are great for this. I got one off eBay for $30 (just make sure it comes with their proprietary AC adapter).

  • gelberhut@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Synology are very good and have good dedicated models for home usage. Way better than old PC. There are YouTube channels about nases, they compare different brands and models - check them.

    “Cheap” is a relative term.

  • Cipher@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m also in the market for this.

    I’m considering setting up a raspberry pi4 nas, and would love to hear pros and cons from people with experience on the matter.

    I assume there are faster solutions, but I think it should meet my needs well

    • Domiku@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The main issue is if you try to attach multiple portable drives. My Pi 3B+ could only really power a single HDD, but I wanted to attach multiple. The only solution there was a powered USB hub. I eventually got an old Lenovo mini PC and used that.

      • Cipher@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I’m just split between that or an odroid hc4. I wouldn’t even need to buy a case for it.

    • Jeff@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I made one with an R-pi and hard drive with Open Media Vault. It was pretty easy to set up, and I haven’t had any trouble with it. Only one disk so far, since I don’t have that much stuff.

    • Qazwsxedcrfv000@lemmy.unknownsys.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t recommend a Pi 4 even if you can get one at the listed price. It is fast enough but it lacks the interface and connectivity for a decent NAS.

      • rackmountrambo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t know about that guy but I use a RasPi 4 with a four bay laptop drive toaster. Four terabyte drives and it works great for streaming to multiple devices.

      • EamonnMR@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s a base model 3, no gobs of memory. I don’t use it for anything especially taxing, just file storage and occasionally streaming music or low-resolution video. The bottleneck is the slow WD Archive hard drive.

  • sanzky@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    the old PC thing is a clear first choice. Also a WD NAS, preloaded with Hard drives have a very good prince point if you also need the HDDs e.g. The WD My Cloud EX2 with 2x6TB HD is currently 422€ (amazon spain) and each individual 6TB WD red is 200€. (leaving the NAS at 20€). If you get the 24TB version is even cheaper than the two HD combined.

    • kobra@readit.buzz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would hesitate with WD. I’ve always been a fan of their drives but their software straight up wiped people’s backup disks a few years ago, iirc. That would give me pause before ever using their software again.

  • pbjamm@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A year ago I bought an Adjustor AS3304t to replace my xpenology frankenas. I have been pretty happy with it as a NAS, but it is not as good as a Synology. Still out was pretty inexpensive and work well for is primary purpose.