• Saik0A
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The math doesn’t work out.

    You only need enough asat missiles to create enough debris. Kessler handles the rest.

      • Saik0A
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Eh, not for long. LEO everything falls eventually. HEO… that can take a long hot minute.

        • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          LEO we’re still talking the better part of a decade, especially the derbies that get kicked to higher altitudes by the collisions. It’s not as permanent as higher up, but it’s still a strategic level capability, not tactical.

          • Saik0A
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            The numbers I’ve heard for LEO are like 4-5 years. But that point is whatever.

            Kessler’ing the LEO means it’s now harder to retaliate in HEO. It would be an easy win for Russia to knock out Starlink if the US government is actually relying on it in any meaningful capacity.

            • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              It sounds like they are using it as a backup for their geostationary sats which would be much higher resolution and data rate. But there aren’t as many of them, so they’re feasible to shoot down.

    • TheHotze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      And also affects China and India, both nations that Russia relies on. Doubly on China who is developing their own LEO internet service.