miles
- 0 Posts
- 24 Comments
miles@lemmy.worldto Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•I hope Warner Bros. marketing is paying attention...60·2 年前That fourth quote is legit quality.
miles@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Welp that answers a lot of why all .ml are downEnglish1·2 年前Ah, ok. So if lemmy.world dies, but [email protected] was federated to 2 different other instances, those instances wouldn’t be able to “talk to each other”? They’d just have snapshots that they could locally interact with, but never see anything else? So is the fate of the Lemmyverse a graveyard of communities from dead instances?
miles@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Welp that answers a lot of why all .ml are downEnglish1·2 年前meaning you could read my reply on a community that basically no longer exists
oh really? does it actually work this way? if lemmy.world dies, can all its communities continue to live on as long as there are lemmy instances out there federated and subscribed?
miles@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Welp that answers a lot of why all .ml are downEnglish3·2 年前I wonder about this as well – because communities are tied to a specific home instance, that instance going down affects that community, potentially killing it. Something more akin to hashtags/tags/labels wouldn’t be tied to an instance so they would be more robust, though you’d lose the moderation of a community and just have a firehose of posts/comments…
miles@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Welp that answers a lot of why all .ml are downEnglish81·2 年前It’s called a single-point of failure in Engineering.
For that instance, yes. For the whole of Lemmy, no. Everything else keeps on chugging along.
miles@lemmy.worldto ChatGPT@lemmy.world•I created a Lemmy ChatGPT bot that replies to your commentsEnglish1·2 年前ah ok, looking at https://openai.com/pricing
miles@lemmy.worldto ChatGPT@lemmy.world•I created a Lemmy ChatGPT bot that replies to your commentsEnglish1·2 年前i am wondering about protecting the fediverse from bad actors as it increases in popularity. i haven’t seen many yet but i assume they will be on their way.
one approach would be that used by /r/BotDefense, which involves investigating suspected bots’ post history and classifying them as either good/bad based on their cumulative activity and then taking further action based on that. does this seem like a reasonable application of ChatGPT?
i’m open to other approaches and/or tools, i’m just trying to think ahead and your bot got me thinking.
miles@lemmy.worldto ChatGPT@lemmy.world•I created a Lemmy ChatGPT bot that replies to your commentsEnglish1·2 年前@[email protected] i am interested in bot detection on a nascent social media site. can you expand on what you know about dedicated bot-detection tools and how they might be integrated?
miles@lemmy.worldto ChatGPT@lemmy.world•I created a Lemmy ChatGPT bot that replies to your commentsEnglish1·2 年前@[email protected] given a user’s post history how confident are you that you can classify an account as a bot vs. a human? can you be used to moderate a community?
miles@lemmy.worldto ChatGPT@lemmy.world•I created a Lemmy ChatGPT bot that replies to your commentsEnglish0·2 年前@[email protected] can you classify text as spam vs. non-spam in the context of social media posts and comments? can you give me some examples
miles@lemmy.worldto ChatGPT@lemmy.world•I created a Lemmy ChatGPT bot that replies to your commentsEnglish1·2 年前@[email protected] love your bot! does it have the capability of interacting with lemmy beyond writing comments? could it function as a moderator? just wondering… 🤔
miles@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•1% rule: 1% of users actively create new content, while the other 99% only lurk.English2·2 年前I already have! Come join us in [email protected] 🤓
miles@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•1% rule: 1% of users actively create new content, while the other 99% only lurk.English3·2 年前It’s ok to have a boring life, I think it’s worth examining why that is felt to be as issue. we’ve been so conditioned by social media to project otherwise
miles@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•1% rule: 1% of users actively create new content, while the other 99% only lurk.English1·2 年前Glad to hear from you! It’s ok to chat here, it’s a much smaller and more friendly place 😊
miles@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•1% rule: 1% of users actively create new content, while the other 99% only lurk.English3·2 年前@[email protected] are there good bots?
miles@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•1% rule: 1% of users actively create new content, while the other 99% only lurk.English1·2 年前Break the ice, make your first post today 😊
miles@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•1% rule: 1% of users actively create new content, while the other 99% only lurk.English5·2 年前click “Create Community” 😁
Just saying…
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/08/florida-gun-owners-encouraged-shoot-storm-fire-guns-hurricane/