![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/82df2b8d-8e60-441f-aafc-5da196dbbe2c.webp)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0d5e3a0e-e79d-4062-a7bc-ccc1e7baacf1.png)
Lmao you’re giving me ideas
He / They
Software Developer
Lmao you’re giving me ideas
Oh! Oh! Block me too!
You’re talking about the blue stuff on a roll, right?
I have some and they are select-a-size.
I debated posting there, I think I’ll crosspost
OP has no interest in getting genuine answers to their question, they simply want people to agree with them.
Their response will be something along the lines of “Well I don’t object to it” or “It’s legal so it’s not wrong”.
Because I don’t care about power dynamics or maturity levels.
You do understand that what you’re saying here is that you choose to completely disregard whether something has been proven to harm others so long as it’s legal or you subjectively do not object to it?
You’ll make a great abuser, please never go into a relationship.
I think you’re stuck on the legal definition of an adult.
Some countries have people become adults at 16, some at 18 and some at 21. 18 is meaningless beyond the laws in place and the legal punishments given to those who break the laws.
Many other reprehensible acts are legal, such as firing people for their ethnicity or gender identity in the US, or running a payday loan scheme.
You need to look at it from the perspective of brain development and power dynamics rather than from a legal or subjective point of view.
Having sexual intercourse with someone below your level of mental maturity is considered morally reprehensible due to the mental harm it may cause to the younger person, and them being unable to consent properly due to the power dynamics of the older partner having more money, more maturity, more status, etc. The younger individual may become dependent on the more mature individual, further driving the negative power dynamic.
(Age / 2) + 7 is your answer.
A 26 year old shouldn’t be with someone younger than 20.
This is a guideline, but it’s generally correct. Especially until around 25 for the youngest partner, the problem comes down to maturity and the potential power dynamics at play due to that lack of mental maturity.
This does mean that an 18 year old can be with a 16 year old, and it’s perfectly fine as they may have roughly the same mental maturity.
Android is not Linux, it is derived from it. The two are not API compatible, and Android ripped out most of what made Linux Linux to be able to support binary blob drivers, direct Dalvik JVM support in the kernel and other funky stuff.
It’s as much Linux as macOS’ XNU kernel is FreeBSD.
Definitely, he should try using Linux in a typical Microsoft-driven corporate environment with a regular laptop for a month and see how it is.
Microsoft is in bed with Canonical though, so Snaps are their preferred method of software delivery.
You do make a good point that there is a decent selection of proprietary software on Linux, but some of these are half-assed attempts (Discord, Zoom, Proton), and the vast majority of vendors are not thinking about Linux at all.
Vendors don’t give a shit about Linux.
Beggars can’t be choosers.
This does indeed directly solve OP’s original problem, but it does not answer the question of why GNOME Software isn’t working as it should.
You can still get a deal on occasion at Best Buy, but you have to be careful and you have to be ready to walk away.
The fact that they have to advertise the Android version tells me this will never see a single update.
Some cases let you mount the GPU vertically, especially SFF cases. This would display the fans of the GPU through the glass.
I’ve seen some people paint their GPU backplate.
Brendan Eich is a piece of shit
They’d have to prove malice first