First they would try to block it on the ISP DNS servers. But this is easily circumvented if you know how.
My guess is he is just throwing out stupid ideas without knowing how to get them implemented.
First they would try to block it on the ISP DNS servers. But this is easily circumvented if you know how.
My guess is he is just throwing out stupid ideas without knowing how to get them implemented.
These companies are the worst. They are responsible for a huge chunk of the emissions fueling the climate change we are facing. (https://www.climatechangenews.com/2023/05/19/study-fossil-fuel-firms-owe-209bn-a-year-for-climate-damage/)
They promise change and then just sweep it under the rug. (https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/feb/01/shell-renwable-energy-spending-sec-global-witness) Even worse is the fact that these companies are misleading the world with a concerted effort on who is to blame. (https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/09/oil-companies-discourage-climate-action-study-says/)
Ever wondered what happened to all these bugs on the car when driving through the countryside? There is already something big happening and we are just getting started.
Here is a talk on the topic of insects driven to the point of extinction due to neonicotinoid pesticides (unfortunately the talk is in german. Maybe someone is able to find a english version) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_p9yYXZuCI
My guess is, that Meta will try to control the public image of the name Mastodon. Yeah the Software itself is OpenSource and protected under AGPL-3, but they still can buy Mastodon GmbH and use that to tie their name to Mastodon for the broad public.
They still have to comply within the 90 day period. If they can’t comply in that timeframe a warning or a fine could be issued.
Has anyone got a source on this? The video doesn’t have any more info linked…
Sounds more like an overvalued market that’s being corrected.