![](https://fanexus.com/pictrs/image/7447101e-0fc9-426e-a6bc-48fbbd3ceb0f.jpeg)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/cd7879c3-cd1c-4108-806e-f9ca45e9b22a.png)
These are just the primaries, not the general election. Primaries are for each party, to choose which candidate from that party will run in the general election in November.
These are just the primaries, not the general election. Primaries are for each party, to choose which candidate from that party will run in the general election in November.
I like how they count “Nothing”, “No response”, and “Other” as being separate religions so that the chart looks nore intimidating.
The amount of creativity Adobe products unleashed upon the world is staggering. Decades ago they were groundbreaking. Just about any piece of media you have ever seen from the past 35+ years has been touched by them in some way.
The Adobe we know now was not the Adobe of back then. Just like the Apple of 1985 is not anything like the Apple we have today. Back then it was about actually developing useful technology, and not just coming up with innovative ways to squeeze every last dollar from every possible customer for the same bloated and tired piece of software.
Back then you had a problem (eg. people wanted to create artistic stuff), and then you had a solution (powerful software to help you). Now software like that is everywhere, so the only way for companies to “compete” is by adding bloat and jacking up the price. Hence the Adobe we see today, full of pointless crap and complex licensing schemes.
To be fair, Spotify might suck for artists, but for users it’s a good value in my opinion, and the price was $9.99 for like 10 years. I don’t begrudge them a small increase. In fact, I wish all the price increases we’ve seen lately would be so modest.
I remember when it was FutureSplash Animator, and my young mind was blown by the possibilities of animations in only a few kb.
I’ve used nothing but Firefox on all desktops/laptops since 2004. I really don’t understand how or why anyone would switch away.
$20 to remove ads, $100 for Ultra.
$17/year to subscribe to Ultra, or $100/once. That means you’d have to subscribe yearly for almost 6 years to break even.
Ultra is $100, and ad-free (I assume what is called “Pro”) is $20.
The option to remove ads has been added - it costs $20 USD. The lifetime Ultra costs $100 USD.
The option to remove ads has been added - it costs $20 USD. The lifetime Ultra costs $100 USD.
The option to remove ads has been added - it costs $20 USD. The lifetime Ultra costs $100 USD.
It is indeed beautifully designed. By far the best looking client I’ve seen yet.
It’s live for me. It appears that the paid version, “Sync Ultra”, requires a $2/month subscription, or $17/year. Seeing as lemmy APIs are free, I am confused why this is so expensive? o_0
Ah, you are correct, I misunderstood the question.
He’s up to three so far, with a fourth likely on the way (Georgia interference).
“He already has, son. He already has.”
“The pun is coming from inside the building!”
I believe that policy was reduced or removed many years ago. Around the time when all the cool new projects stopped, and Google scrubbed “don’t be evil” from their site and company philosophy.
I’m not Swedish, but I’m proud of them, too!