I’ve still got a Nexus One floating around somewhere!
I’ve still got a Nexus One floating around somewhere!
It certainly seems heavy to me. I’m not entirely certain what I’d replace it with. If money were no object and it didn’t have f holes then I’d probably get a thinking Tele.
It wouldn’t be so bad if they could only cuddle you to death. Still not great, but better…
A Fender Telecaster. I love it, but my health isn’t good enough to let me play on it very much. Plus, I sometimes wonder if I should’ve gone for a lighter guitar…
How long do these drivers usually take to move out of beta?
Yeah, my 1070 is still going very strong.
Honestly - even seeing one of their square poos would be quite a thing!
Seeing a Wombat in the wild is a dream of mine.
If I was in Australia I’d be so excited to see wombats. Is also be scared of seeing spiders…
AH yes - I thought it must be an American thing.
Yeah - I reckon it must be an American thing.
Who on earth calls their feet “dogs”? I’ve also never heard of “putting on the dog”, but that’s probably just because. 🐶
IANAL, but I doubt it. While I think it probably follows the spirit of the law, it’s unlikely to meet the actual law itself - which is what counts.
Of course, you don’t mention what country you’re from - which could make all the difference…
You’re often old? But what about the rest of the time?
liberal simply means a supporter of capitalism
That’s simply not true. Liberal means being open to other ideas and tolerant of people having other opinions.
And that’s fair enough. Claiming you can definitively disprove the existence of the Christian God and having some objections that you haven’t heard a convincing response to aren’t the same thing though…
None of this is new or hasn’t been thought about, written about and deflated for centuries. I doubt you have any theologians shaking in their boots.
The meaning of omnipotence as it translates to Good has always been nuanced. There have always been things God can’t do - sin being the obvious example. You could debate whether he can, but just never would because of his character, but it amounts to the same thing and has been orthodoxy for centuries.
The apparent contradictions on the Gospels (especially synoptic) have been done to death. Debated and answered more times than you’ve had hot dinners. There is no serious theologian or biblical scholar who would hear that argument and be at all concerned by it.
Honestly the same applies to the idea of a good god and suffering.
Unless you claim, as OP did, that you can actually disprove it.
I agree that the Bible is not sufficient in the sense that it proves anything or sews up their arguments, but to suggest its historical value as evidence is the same as modern day fiction is absurd.
Yes, you said that, but what exactly?
Pretty sure the story isn’t that he let them kill him just to respect their freedom and significance…