I’ve done playthroughs as both. I think they both have excellent voice acting. But I think the character of Shepard as Earth’s military golden boy/girl works better with the standard military jarhead looking guy. IMO he embodies the generic “John Masseffect” energy better.

It’s funny because the games do let you customize the appearance, race, and hairstyle of Shephard, but to me he will always be that default settings buzzcut guy with a fivehead and big jaw.

Lol yeah, the things that are actually emitting half of every back-and-forth radio communication between a device and a cell tower

Lol don’t tell them about all the radio frequencies around them all the time

Like a Roomba?

Lots of stocks did. Everyone knew he would do things that benefit the large corpos (lower taxes, slash environmental regulation, remove labour rights). But then of course he got to claim the economy was doing good since American media thinks “stock market” = “the economy”

There’s a reason they’re all in the same part of India and it’s because the police in that area have been bought off.

It’s Kolkata right? That’s the sense I get from watching anti scammer YouTubers like Jim Browning.

Relevant KOTH

Quebec unions are really powerful. This would be awesome

Seconding Beelink. I have one of their SER boxes as my solution to smart tv and it works great

Make the games have extra content for Prime subscribers

That was the point I think. In a game about spies, you want the pistol to feel OP so the player feels like a spy. It wouldn’t feel very James Bond to mow down enemies with the LMG.

Also I still have nightmares about the boss battle with the Russian cocaine guy

What does this have to do with Ubisoft?

That’s the thing that gets me. Undercutting is the quintessential anticompetitive practice, and it’s Epic’s entire business model. They give away games for free because they are trying to siphon some of Steam’s customers. They make exclusive release deals with publishers because they want to force people to use their platform. They are trying to compete with Steam using their resources from the success of Fortnite and Unreal rather than compete with the storefront by actually having a better storefront.

I was making a joke about abusing Chinese censorship in order to stop them cloning GitHub repos (assuming that was something you wanted to do). The joke being that the CCP suppresses information about their human rights abuses. That is not true of the US. You could absolutely make a GitHub repo detailing the crimes of the US government. Nobody will stop you.

Apparently they aren’t respecting licenses. It’s possible to have source code publicly available on GH but have it not be truly FOSS. But that’s generally not a great idea since you’re effectively relying on the honour system for people not to take your code.

It’s funny how much effort you’re going to debating my word choice instead of the meaning and content of my rebuttal to your stupid comment. Do you have an actual point here? Are you claiming that what you were doing above wasn’t whataboutism? That it’s somehow a valid counterpoint to my joke about CCP censorship to say that the US also does bad things?

Lmao it’s literally the name of a logical fallacy. How is the term itself fallacious?

Also I harbour no racism or ill will toward the Chinese people. My girlfriend is Chinese and I care about her a lot and love learning about her culture. I just don’t abide the human rights atrocities (or censorship thereof) committed by any government.

Life imitates art

I’m not American. I don’t even like America.

Yeah I figured as much. It was mostly a joke. At the end of the day, if stuff is on GH, people can take it. It’s barely even stealing. Unless the license disagrees of course but then you were putting a lot of trust in society by making it public in the first place.