Gresham's Law

Cut throat environments!

A. Device part of a business infrastructure:
Just don’t change anything; those policy are there for a reason!

B. Consumer device:
1/ If we’re talking about proprietary hardware/software forcing your network to use a specific DNS, then you need to provide more details because you should be able to change it.

2/ There is also the case for a malware:
A fresh start is preferable.
Disinfect the system while offline, then back up the needed files.
Reinstall the system on a new/old formatted drive.
With the exception of taking your privacy/security seriously this time.

They’re constructed hierarchy not natural (That hints that someone didn’t want to be the fuckup alone & created a destructive system for everyone) otherwise we would be living in a socialist utopia.

I invite everyone to listen to this episode, The history of humanity with Christopher Knight https://www.historicly.net/p/the-history-of-humanity-with-christopher

I hope it was in an airgapped environment.

Mozilla opposes a proposal because it goes against their principles and vision for the Web.
They believe that any browser, server, or publisher that follows common standards should be considered part of the Web.
Standards are designed to be independent of specific hardware or software, allowing for a wide range of devices, operating systems, and browsers to access the Web.
This diversity of choices promotes accessibility and overcomes personal obstacles.
Mechanisms that restrict these choices harm the openness of the Web and are not beneficial for users.

The proposal’s use cases rely on the ability to detect non-human traffic, which could hinder assistive technologies, automatic testing, and archiving and search engine spiders.
These tools require access to content intended for humans in order to transform, test, index, and summarize it.
The proposed safeguards are unlikely to be effective and fail to address these concerns adequately.

Mozilla acknowledges the importance of addressing fraud and invalid traffic but finds the proposal lacking in practical progress for the listed use cases and highlights clear downsides to its adoption.

Credit: https://chatbot.theb.ai/ just another version of https://chat.openai.com/ without the need to sign-up.

“Someone tweeted at him” Narrative built for liability reasons.

It’s a crucifix to taunt the masses due to how powerless we are against the elites and their pawns.

For more contexts: St. Andrew’s Cross or the Saltire Cross.

Narrative built for liability reasons.

It’s a crucifix to taunt the masses due to how powerless we are against the elites and their pawns.

For more contexts: St. Andrew’s Cross or the Saltire Cross.

There are plenty already, why not a joint?
More solidarity/less division would be nice but it doesn’t mean that some individuals wouldn’t need to prove themselves to the tasks.

Without accountability it’s moot but it’s not like it’s possible with the current technological advancements & as always they create a hierarchy about fucking everything.

Pretty sure you’re describing most if not all the developer’s demographics, coding can always be optimized.
The same goes for a lot of things we do in life (Productivity).

Ever thought about checking Purism:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purism_(company)?wprov=sfla1

The irony is lost on me, how about using KeePass

https://lmddgtfy.net/?q=site%3Agithub.com keepass

Yes there seems to be something going on from May to June that they felt the need to make a snapshot of headlines on the home page

https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/https://www.reddit.com/r/NewYuzuPiracy