Wren

I’m not changing the definition. I’m simply explaining my interpretation of it. Threats of murder are a form of terrorism.

If a person that plays guitar is called a guitarist, then a person that terrorizes others is a terrorist.

It’s pretty simple.

As a rule, a man who has never worked a day in his life- should have no authority over those who do.

If their victim died in terror, yes. They are.

Ya don’t say……

It’s not really a huge loss. MWS is basically a watered down .ml.

“Ideological” pretty much covers everything else. A threat to kill is an act of terrorism.

I think what’s happening here, is that murder has become so normalized that we have reached a point where the word “terrorism” has to have some special definition that excludes it from the regular run-of-the-mill terror one would experience when they’re life is threatened for whatever reason.

I mean, would you feel terror if someone threatened your life in a way that you truly believed you were in danger?

Oh, and she sung a song in Spanish, and was threatened with death for not singing in American English. That screams political to me…

“Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence against non-combatants to achieve political or ideological aims.”

So… no, I think I got it right. I mean, its root is from the Latin word- “terror”. A threat of death is sure to cause such a feeling in most people. So- in this form, the threat illustrates the act of one person terrorizing another. Therefore- one who terrorizes is a terrorist by definition.

This is not a stretch to arrive at this conclusion. That it sounds foreign might be a result of the normalization of violence.

The Supreme Court in-and-of-itself, is a setback to transgender rights.

If you threaten to kill someone, you are using terror to manipulate them into being fearful.

A death threat because you don’t like someone is still an intention to instill fear in someone. So yes. You’d be a terrorist.

By definition: terrorism is the calculated use of violence or the threat of violence to instill fear, often to achieve political, religious, or ideological goals. Killing someone out of hate is an ideological goal.

Oh I know. I was just making a statement about it.

This shouldn’t be decided by politicians.

What does a sitting president have to do with the sale of a foreign company?

Appreciate the laugh. Needed this today.

Somehow, this is going to be Obama’s fault.

I mean, he makes pillows right? So it probably wouldn’t be a giant leap for him to start manufacturing couches I’d assume? …all he has to do, is make a few My Couches™ , then just pimp them out to Vance.

Presto! Debt paid.

I sincerely hope the hell he rots in is an eternal version of whatever his cowardice created that influenced him to do this. He deserves to live in eternal fear.

I didn’t fucking say “both sides.”

Goes on to say “both sides”

Hilarious!

Both sides! Amirite?

Everyone still glad we dodged that Harris bullet? I mean… Imagine how much worse this would have been, right?

/s