TheTechnician27
“Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: […] like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.” —Jonathan Swift
- 138 Posts
- 605 Comments
TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldto Not The Onion@lemmy.world•Heathrow to pipe 'sounds of an airport' around airportEnglish4·6 days agoI actually disagree having listened to it as someone who gets sensory overload and panic attacks. (Disclaimer: I’ve just listened with headphones; the real-world implementation might change this.)
I thought the music was pleasant. I can see it helping to organically drown out the loud, chaotic, stressful noises naturally present in the airport.
I’m interested to hear what other people who get sensory overload think, though, since I’ll bet it manifests in very different ways.
TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldto Not The Onion@lemmy.world•Man steals 53 right shoes from store in Australia.English3·6 days agoI’m just saying, renaming your store to “53 Shoes” after this would be really funny.
TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldto Not The Onion@lemmy.world•Idaho bans ‘Everyone Is Welcome Here’ classroom signs, calling them ideologicalEnglish601·8 days agoThat actually isn’t weird at all. People treat “politics” as an epithet for “controversial politics”, but in reality, almost everything in society is political – relating to power structures, the distribution of status and resources, and how those factors are determined. What you’re getting at, of course, is that Republicans have shifted the Overton window so disgustingly far to the right that “everyone is welcome” in a classroom is treated as a controversial ideology.
We’re constantly conditioned to think of the status quo as apolitical in nature (it’s just “normal” and the people who want to change it for better or worse are “the politicals”), but it is and always has been, and it’s why we’ve needed so desperately these past several decades to remain politically engaged to protect what we want and to change what we don’t. Now? Who knows, but we still need to try.
TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Your smart bulbs record 78% of conversations even when you think they're offEnglish81·11 days agoOP, the site you’re linking to is LLM slop. Like seriously just look at this site for a second.
- There’s zero consistent theme.
- The images are generated.
- They’re all “BY JOHN” (no pfp, no last name, no bio, let alone no indication why they’re qualified to write about this cornucopia of shit).
- It only ever hyperlinks to itself – i.e. the sources may as well be “I made it the fuck up”.
- The way the articles are structured are LLM slop to a tee – randomly bolding words, meandering prose, overuse of bullet points, jarring logical flow, etc.
- At least five articles per day from the same “person” despite extensive length, perfect grammar, and alleged research being done.
Can’t you please link to an actual source to make this claim?
TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldto politics @lemmy.world•US tries to deport stateless Palestinian woman again despite judge’s orderEnglish221·13 days ago“Russia invades Ukraine.” “Um ackshually many Russians do not support this move.”
You understand how discussing groups as a singular entity works, right?
sudo
is telling the computer to do this with root privileges.chmod
sets permissions.- Each digit of that three-digit number corresponds to the owner, the group, and other users, respectively. It’s 0–7, where 0 means no access and 7 means access to read, write, and execute. So
077
is the exact inverse of700
, where077
means “the owner cannot access their own files, but everyone else can read, write, and execute them”. Corresponding700
to asexuals is joking that nobody but the owner can even so much as touch the files. /
is the root directory, i.e. the very top of the filesystem.- The
-R
flag says to do this recursively downward; in this case, that’s starting from/
.
So here, we’re modifying every single file on the entire system to be readable, writable, and executable by everyone but their owner. And yes, this is supposed to be extremely stupid.
TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldto politics @lemmy.world•128 Democrats join House Republicans to block AOC, Al Green bid to impeach TrumpEnglish293·20 days agoAIPAC dark money paying for itself thousands of times over.
Basically what @[email protected] said: the idea is to be practicable. Here’s a stream of disconnected thoughts about this:
- What you pointed out is actually consistent with how a disproportionate amount of vegans are staunchly anticapitalist.
- A cut-and-dry example of someone who’s still vegan but eats animal products based on “practicable” is someone whose prescription medication contains gelatin with no other pill type; vegans aren’t going to say “lol ok too bad bozo you’re not vegan anymore”.
- The core focus of veganism has traditionally been non-human animals with the idea that a reduction of cruelty and exploitation toward humans is, at most, peripheral. This is changing in my opinion, especially when questions like “vegan Linux distro” don’t involve animals short of what the devs eat.
- Based on what you say (as someone else pointed out), a distro based solely on FLOSS would probably be regarded as “the most vegan” if that were ever measured by anyone (it never would be).
- It’s a weird analogy, but after you’re done using and purchasing products derived from animals, what’s “practicable” from there is kind of like a vegan post-game. Many vegans, for example, won’t eat palm oil because of how horribly destructive it is to wildlife.
- Growing all your own food is in that post-game area of “practicable”. It’s up to you to decide if that’s practicable for you. It’s up to you to implement that if you think it is or, if it’s not, to maybe think about how else you can reduce harm with how you buy vegetables. It’s up to you if you want to share that idea and help other people implement it themselves. It’s widely accepted that it’s not up to you to determine if it’s practicable for others.
I would say that most vegans, even if they’ve never heard it, at least approximately follow the Vegan Society’s famous definition:
Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals.
Striking the parts that seem irrelevant to this specific question:
Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for […] any […] purpose […]
Keep in mind that “animals” in that first part is widely treated as “humans and non-human animals”. So you would have to decide 1) to what extent cruelty was inflicted to create the distro, 2) to what extent people and non-human animals were exploited to create the distro, and 3) if there exist practicable alternatives that meaningfully reduce (1) and (2).
TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Founder of 23andMe buys back company out of bankruptcy auctionEnglish9·29 days agoOP, you linked to the comments instead of the top of the article. 💀
TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldto Not The Onion@lemmy.world•'Very telling': Trump agency under fire after posting Russian flag on Flag DayEnglish691·30 days agoAren’t you that smarmy, confidently incorrect asshat that recently got clowned on by like seven Germans?
TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•A 3-tonne, $1.5 billion satellite to watch Earth’s every move is set to launch this weekEnglish5·30 days agoI’m not agreeing with their dumb point, but just pointing out: this satellite works on radar. I’m genuinely concerned how many people seem to be commenting without reading the article.
TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•A 3-tonne, $1.5 billion satellite to watch Earth’s every move is set to launch this weekEnglish718·30 days agoI don’t know why you’re assuming their ‘/s’ is alluding to sarcasm around this being surveillance versus sarcasm around needing more surveillance. “We need more surveillance (we actually don’t)” seems to be indicated here, not “This is surveillance (it actually isn’t)”.
Especially when Reddit types are notoriously, chronically unable to read articles before they go spouting uninformed bullshit in the comments.
TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•A 3-tonne, $1.5 billion satellite to watch Earth’s every move is set to launch this weekEnglish1529·30 days agoDid you read the part where this is a radar satellite designed for monitoring the climate? That is, did you read anything besides the headline before you decided: “Yeah, I think I’m able to make informed commentary about this”?
TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Wikipedia Pauses AI-Generated Summaries After Editor BacklashEnglish75·1 month agoFucking thank you. Yes, experienced editor to add to this: that’s called the lead, and that’s exactly what it exists to do. Readers are not even close to starved for summaries:
- Every single article has one of these. It is at the very beginning – at most around 600 words for very extensive, multifaceted subjects. 250 to 400 words is generally considered an excellent window to target for a well-fleshed-out article.
- Even then, the first sentence itself is almost always a definition of the subject, making it a summary unto itself.
- And even then, the first paragraph is also its own form of summary in a multi-paragraph lead.
- And even then, the infobox to the right of 99% of articles gives easily digestible data about the subject in case you only care about raw, important facts (e.g. when a politician was in office, what a country’s flag is, what systems a game was released for, etc.)
- And even then, if you just want a specific subtopic, there’s a table of contents, and we generally try as much as possible (without harming the “linear” reading experience) to make it so that you can intuitively jump straight from the lead to a main section (level 2 header).
- Even then, if you don’t want to click on an article and just instead hover over its wikilink, we provide a summary of fewer than 40 characters so that readers get a broad idea without having to click (e.g. Shoeless Joe Jackson’s is “American baseball player (1887–1951)”).
What’s outrageous here isn’t wanting summaries; it’s that summaries already exist in so many ways, written by the human writers who write the contents of the articles. Not only that, but as a free, editable encyclopedia, these summaries can be changed at any time if editors feel like they no longer do their job somehow.
This not only bypasses the hard work real, human editors put in for free in favor of some generic slop that’s impossible to QA, but it also bypasses the spirit of Wikipedia that if you see something wrong, you should be able to fix it.
TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Kamala Harris won the U.S elections: Bombshell report claims voting machines were tampered with before 2024English111·1 month agoOP, come the fuck on. Have some integrity and don’t post articles from The Economic Times.
TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Advanced AI suffers ‘complete accuracy collapse’ in face of complex problems, study findsEnglish8·1 month agoNo, they definitely are AI. ChatGPT for example is a generative pretrained transformer (GPT) is a transformer model is a deep learning model is a machine learning model is AI.
It’s just that the general public has no fucking idea what “AI” is due to being swamped in marketing about a field they have zero background in and have been led to believe is some kind of general intellect on the level of a human or smarter. In reality, a perceptron with one weight and one bias is machine learning is AI.
Since the start, what “AI” is has been fairly arbitrary; it’s just the ability for a machine to perform tasks we’d associate with human intelligence. It doesn’t even need to be machine learning; that’s just one branch. The game Video Checkers (1980) for the Atari 2600 running on 128 bytes of RAM has AI that you play against. The bar isn’t high at all.
TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Google used to show ads I didn't mind. Now Google is THE reason I use adblockers.English96·1 month agoThat’s because every company’s strategy aiming to monopolize is to:
- Make a product that’s genuinely better than what’s on the market for some role. Sometimes by undercutting competition at a loss, sometimes by making things very convenient, etc.
- Once you’re big enough, make sure as you keep growing that new competition can’t pop up to challenge you. Kick the ladder down behind you, and make sure to start greasing the palms of lawmakers so they can’t challenge you in step 3.
- Once you’re so big that you’ve monopolized the market and can’t be challenged no matter what you do (both because of ladder-kicking and because everyone uses you by default), do what you’ve been wanting to this whole time and go from “boiling frog”-pace enshittification to “welp, this sucks, but now I have nowhere else to go” enshittification.
It’s why people who say “Oh, well I wouldn’t mind it if X had a monopoly because they’re way better than those other companies” are so painfully misguided.
A friend brought up Greenland nuking somebody as a joke. And I imagined how disproportionate a retaliatory strike could be, quickly remembering though that the current population is less than 60,000 and that I’m almost certain I’ve seen figures of more than 60,000 nukes during the Cold War, so I imagined a retaliatory strike where literally every person in Greenland had a personalized nuke.
The research was done make sure I wasn’t misremembering, that Greenland didn’t at any point exceed 60,000 (thus necessitating a closer comparison), and that I’m not Senator Armstrong-ing this.