CrossCode, for the third time in about two weeks.
I’m 5 years late to it because for some reason I thought it was a JRPG…
CrossCode, for the third time in about two weeks.
I’m 5 years late to it because for some reason I thought it was a JRPG…
Ah yes, the Unum tower’s child
I have a few in my library:
I don’t think these games aim for nostalgia, nostalgia alone is not a good reason to choose low-poly or low-res graphics.
Low-res textures and sprites have the advantage of being much easier for artists not only to hand draw, but to explicitly choose what details to give to a certain surface.
3D games with low-res rendering also have their own appeal, like you say: they tell you what you’re looking at but still leaves your imagination the burden of filling in the details.
To me low-poly models don’t really have their own appeal, unlike pixelated visuals, however I also don’t mind them at all.
I still occasionally play games like Perfect Dark and TLoZ: OoT on their recompiled PC ports, they look good despite their low-poly nature because they don’t need high-poly models and their animations would look uncanny if they did (goofy ahh textures though).
However, there are some retro effects that I find to be straight up ugly: Signalis applies a CRT effect occasionally, which I can’t say I’m fond of.
Yeah, but do you know how dangerous a tree is? It will eat you alive without mercy
I had the opposite experience with Windows (7 up to 10), every now and then I would have to reinstall it to get some random feature working, which made the system run smoothly for a while - which checks out, considering Windows’ affinity for software rot.
Then again, I increasingly debloated it as time went on, which I’d assume contributes to its instability.
IP addresses ran out, IPv6 adds more addresses than we may need, ISPs decide to take away the user’s ability to host servers (more or less (more less than more)) rather than upgrading the infrastructure
Lost access to your email? Nuh uh.
#2 Windows
I’m not sure about specific packages, but in general a packager may not want to increase the upstream version even if they can do it themselves - for example, they may have made some mistake in the packaging process.
A recompilation or repackaging of Linux 6.6.6 is still Linux 6.6.6
No need to get upset, chill out jeez
With the last two big things I’ve heard about (Yuzu and… Dolphin, I think?) they were legally in the right, but at least where I live there is absolutely no way to spin a recompiler + asset extractor as something illegal - they can’t even claim the developers are circumventing DRM, because OOT and MM didn’t have any.
Though, I would not be surprised if there’s something in US law that can be exploited for this.
Ship Of Harkinian (and similar projects) have kept gping for a long time, and they don’t do anything remotely illegal either
I see it more like a “we’re good for now I guess, fuck around again and I’ll change it back to negative”
10% is a lot by I WANT MORE MONEY RIGHT NOW shareholder metrics
Agreed. For detecting cheaters, statistics work like a Dream
I’d imagine some of them are here:
(edit: forgot to un-dox the user)
Gotta recycle this:
™