![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/7b678762-2b5a-4b93-990c-cfe4fbe0b1cc.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/8nN0qtLEOJ.png)
Yeah, definitely depends on who I’m recommending to. If it’s someone who’s pretty familiar with games, I think it would be Elden Ring. Love the sense of exploration and discovery in that game.
🚨 My active profile is on Lemmy.zip. 🚨
Still figuring things out here. In the world, I mean.
Yeah, definitely depends on who I’m recommending to. If it’s someone who’s pretty familiar with games, I think it would be Elden Ring. Love the sense of exploration and discovery in that game.
I switched fairly recently. I was on Ting before, and they appear to be quietly sunsetting that service after Dish Network bought them a few years back. Hoping the same doesn’t happen to Mint. It’s been great so far. Incredible value!
Yeah, come to think of it, I think this is a larger issue I have in life: I always have to be working toward a goal or else I feel guilty. I can see your point of view too though. If there’s no beginning and end, there’s no minimum amount of time you need to play. The goal is just to enjoy.
My perspective is basically the inverse: if there’s no beginning and end, there’s no maximum amount of time I need to play. 😅
I don’t feel this way about open-world games because they do usually have an end and you can skip a lot of the open-world filler content. I get this anxiety about sandbox games. I hate it because I really enjoy games like Cities Skylines and I’d love to get into Dwarf Fortress, but I can’t play them anymore because I could spend 1,000 hours in one of them and never finish. That open-endedness keeps me from playing.
Greater transparency under capitalism is always a good thing. I have to admit, one thing Trump did that I liked was to force hospitals to publish their prices. I can’t think of a good reason people buying a thing shouldn’t know how much it costs beforehand.
I would like to make a distinction between a “content creator” in the literal sense — just a person who creates content — and a “content creator” as the phrase is commonly used today — a person who makes a living by selling content or by giving away content to market something else.
I, for one, would be very interested in seeing more people on the fediverse creating content, but I’m not super interested in the fediverse becoming a marketing channel for professional content creators.
Of course, it’s an open platform, so pro content creators are more than welcome to join. I’m just not super excited about approaching them and saying, “please come hock your wares to us on the fediverse!”
This is a great tip, but it has one caveat. I believe this will return a 404 (not found) if your instance hasn’t pulled the community yet. If I create a brand new community on one instance, go to another, and click a link like the one you’ve proposed, I will see a 404. Then, if I search for that same community on the instance with the 404, it will find it. I believe at that point, the link will work, although it may require me to click on the search result first before the instance is “aware” of the community.
At least, that’s the way it worked for me a couple of days ago. 😅
Yes, many parts of MGS 1, but some that stand out for me:
An instance agnostic link for anyone not on lemmy.world: futurama @ lemmy.world
Then, I have a couple that pre-date even boomers by many years 😅:
Just got around to playing (most of) Mother 3 last year. It has a lot of the same charm and is really interesting in its own way… but it still didn’t hit me quite the same way Earthbound did.
Let’s see if I can offer one suggestion for each of these platforms. 😀
Hope that helps!
The Elden Ring Tiger Electronics LCD game is pretty fun.