You don’t have to say you’re anti-war before saying you support supplying Ukraine. Giving Ukraine the means to defend themselves from warmongering is a form of being anti-war.
You don’t have to say you’re anti-war before saying you support supplying Ukraine. Giving Ukraine the means to defend themselves from warmongering is a form of being anti-war.
You: “I’m not Russian. I’m not a troll.”
Also you: immediately proceeds to pretend supplying Ukraine with the weapons they need to defend from a warmongering Russia is itself warmongering
Next you’ll say that a rape victim defending themself is aggression
Lol cupcake you’re implying that the jan 6 prosecutions and trump’s prosecutions are, despite the mountain of evidence about them, not justice and just political stunts. You’re so full of shit your eyes are brown. At this point maga cultists like yourself probably have a worse grasp on reality than scientologists
Ah the I’m rubber you’re glue approach, solid.
With the maga cult lies that you just peddled in your previous comment, I don’t believe you
legislators choose to do nothing for about half a year before slowly murmuring…
Let me correct that for you: legislators pointing this out are prevented from doing anything because the opposing party has enough numbers to stop anything from happening that’d piss off their base regarding trump.
And no, we’re not ok
Interesting, thanks for the info. I’ll have to google around about this when I have some free time today
What’s a DNS server?
Well if it makes you feel any better, not forgoing idealism in the face of reality would help trump win. So the realism of voting for biden and getting him to win is the best possible outcome, as far as getting as close to your ideals as possible is concerned.
Curious what liberal socialist ideals your talking about forgoing here
You sure you dont want to put any more buzzwords and random accusations you can think of into your response? I’ll give you another go at it.
Baaaaaaaa
Gotcha, so you are in fact implying that anyone should be allowed to say whatever they want on other people’s digital property, and cloaking it in platitudes about censorship and 1984 rah rah. Trying to be eloquent in your response doesn’t hide the substance of what you’re saying.
Side note: I always love how conservatives, “nonpolitical” people, and “centrists” evoke 1984 imagery while also claiming that liberals are a vast and powerful, but also clumsy and weak, enemy. Almost like you use the same rhetoric on your enemies that the book you jackoff to had its sheep masses believe about their fake enemy. I’m sure that realization won’t have much impact on your programmed double-think, though.
At this point I can’t decide if Jill Stein and the green party are just useful idiots, or are actively trying to make the general election easier for the GOP
Shame that the representatives themselves can’t get hit by fines if it’s abundantly clear something was gonna be unconstitutional and unenforceable from the get-go. Threaten the fuckers with penalties they’ll actually feel for performative bullshit
To be clear, are you implying you think private entities should have to let you screech anything you want on their digital front lawn?
Musk isn’t gonna pay you for all these apologetics you’re making in this post
You think conspiracy theories in general sound reasonable, don’t you
Then be mad that Putin is forcing them into this situation