The first, if it’s Kroger, don’t have to use a phone #, or yours at least. But honestly I’d recommend not getting groceries there.

Sprinkle in a little credit card debt and 2k rent and good luck. You’d think the 1% would be trying to change something before the guillotines come out

Fiction, but as I’ve been watching the rings of power with my wife, every few minutes she’ll ask why something happened or why something is important and in some cases I can explain how it connects to this or that, then there are other times I’m like, idk, they created that plot hole when they created this plot line from thin air.

It sure feels that way, explaining to kids that YouTubers will say anything to get you to keep watching, meanwhile the elderly are following Qanon bullshit.

breathes sigh of relief

Right, having trouble following the logic here. When referring to the constitution, people can (and do) refer to it in it’s original state.

If you Google constitution you find the original document including photos. I could understand why someone would possibly expect all amendments. But the thing does also list “bill of rights” and for the average American that would purchase such a thing it’s more than enough. I’m sure we’ll see these on auction in 20 or 30 years.

What I really don’t get is the anger this conversation has drawn, the title of the article tries to imply that not including all the amendments is an intentional act of sexism & racism. As if trump is hand selecting it all. We don’t need a money grab bible to tell us he’s sexist & racist.

TIL

Yah, props for mentioning, all to often it’s a question that goes unanswered in these discussions. I completely agree the pros outweigh the cons and it’s better to eradicate some of these diseases. I fear that a big reason some who choose to not vaccinate do so is because of the lack of transparency about vaccine injury. They have a family member or close acquaintance that experienced it firsthand and the public discussion around it is often toxic to the point it feels conspiratorial with people only pointing to the Wakefield study (which was garbage so doesn’t help either side). Researching it without a great understanding of it can return a lot of confirmation bias too.

So many things are starting to make sense

A few more people would probably use bikes, but I don’t see how this solves the issue, no matter how good the cycling infrastructure we won’t see cars and gas stations just disappear. I suspect I don’t see the goals as you intend them, but I don’t see people dropping there kids off at school on bikes or biking to and from a restaurant to eat a steak dinner, not to mention city services and transportation. If your target is really emissions I’d suspect that electric cars and limiting private jets would make more progress.

Makes sense in that context

Right, my thought has always been I’d rather change the ink when the print quality bothers me, not because the company that sold me the printer is forcing me to.

My wife just recently saw the appeal, after years of explaining.

Hard to pick, but it’s between 2, with a couple runners up. N64 Zelda OoT or PS2 Final Fantasy X

I played each so many times, and would love to have that experience for the first time again.

Yes, so rare now, I just ordered a connector id lost so I can play ddr on my old PS2 again.

Meanwhile every other ad on YouTube is ai voice generated Biden saying to hurry and sign up for this $6400 subsidy.

WFH is my goal, already doing the excel, company I’m in is really relaxed, so can’t complain, but WFH would be nice

Went ahead and deleted today, wasn’t an active user, but it’s not a platform I want to support in the slightest.