Do they? Pretty sure lots of people would reject an idea like “maybe we should just kill disabled people” whatever you call it.

Ok, now make an argument for Harris that isn’t “Trump Bad”

We know he is, the problem is Harris is bad, too.

I will very much enjoy not being rounded up by the Department of Homeland Security for it.

Run this one by all the people beaten and arrested for protesting the genocide we’re funding in Palestine.

If Trump gets elected again… I think the possibility of Palestinians getting exterminated becomes a genuine possibility, and the damage to our climate and our ability to reverse course after four years look very fragile.

Biden has given unconditional support to Israel, and had even circumvented Congress to give them more material support. Biden has not only done nothing of substance to fight climate change, but has approved more federal oil drilling permits than Trump.

If Trump did the things Biden did, Democrats would correctly call him a war criminal and threat to the planet.

As soon as the land of any country has all become private property, the landlords, like all other men, love to reap where they never sowed, and demand a rent even for its natural produce.

Card-carrying member of the Communist Party Adam Smith

Maybe the market isn’t the best way to distribute a basic human need

This seems futile, but it’s a decent point to hammer on. Libs who believe international law means something get put in the uncomfortable position of rethinking that, it’s more grounded than “I disagree with this as a matter of policy,” and you’ll smoke out plenty of people who will show their asses with “that shit doesn’t apply to us” takes.

You care more about posting etiquette than you do about Canadian parliament applauding a Nazi.

This story has circulated widely enough (I see multiple articles on BBC and CBS, among other outlets) that they had to issue an apology. I don’t believe you haven’t heard of it, but if you really haven’t, what does that say about where you’re getting your news/what draws your attention?

Do you have even the slightest problem with Canadian parliament applauding a Nazi? You and a bunch of other people here seem to think litigating how to post is more important than the actual issue.

Here’s the news story if you missed the dozen other threads on it and the discussion elsewhere in this thread. Let me know if you need anything else spoonfed to you.

The Canadian parliament gave one of these Nazis a standing ovation within the past week.

The point is that who that guy was should be no surprise to anyone, because this all has been public knowledge since (at least) Windows 95.

This is relevant context to the recent incident of the Canadian parliament giving a standing ovation to one of these Nazis.

Holy shit, read what you respond to

The guy criticizing Canada for knowingly admitting Nazis is somehow a Nazi?

Sharp as a cue ball, this one

“I’m lazy” is your argument here? Even the blurb from the start of the article says this immigration happened in 1950.

Did history start yesterday? Are we ever allowed to discuss the background of current events?

I explained why in the comment you responded to, read that lol

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed.

If you’re going to rules lawyer, do it well.

This is very obviously relevant to a recent news story that has had several posts here already.

This is relevant context to the recent incident of the Canadian parliament giving a standing ovation to one of these Nazis. The “narrative” here is that that it’s abhorrent and no one in the room has an excuse to plead ignorance as the presence of Nazis in Canada was well-known at least 25 years ago.

funny relatable memes

I’ll let you know when I see one!

…Nothing in that article says Russia supports the coup government. It doesn’t mention a Russian stance at all; it just says the coup government has asked Wagner for support (which it does not say has been given).

You’ve now ignored for a second time how stupid it is to think Russia engineered this, then simultaneously tried to hide it/paid locals to wave Russian flags around.

I asked you what your theory is on the situation and you responded by putting words in my mouth.

Again, do you think Russia engineered this, only to deny it, only to pay people to waive Russian flags around?

That can be fixed with restrictions on what corporations can get away with

The problem is that capital can and does react to this. Companies will bribe and lobby until they can erode whatever meager guardrails you managed to install, and in the meantime they’ll carefully calculate how much they can break the law before the consequences outweigh the benefits.

As long as capital is the main driver of politics this will keep happening. “Take money out of politics” doesn’t work, either, because capital will erode or evade those laws, too. You do have to look at moving on from capitalism if you want anything more than a small, temporary change.