IMO, one of the worst parts of the article is this quote:

[…] “We might have to put DOGE on Elon,” [Trump] said. […] “If DOGE looks at Musk, we’re going to save a fortune,[sic]” […] ^[1]

To me, this reads as an admission of guilt from Trump that he instructs DOGE to withhold its scrutiny from entities favorable to him, and that he biases it towards entities unfavorable to him.

[Tesseract is] a Photon fork.

TIL that Tesseract is a Photon Fork. Would you know, by chance, at what point in Photon’s development it was forked to form Tesseract, and what the rationale was?

It’s the second most useless thing in his house.

What’s the first?

omg, I hadn’t seen that meme in ages.

I agree with this, in that I think it avoids the issue of appearing to side with one or the other — I think it’s more neutral.

What client are you using?

I use Lemmy UI ^[1], Tesseract ^[2], and Thunder ^[3].

[…] Boost is totally screwing up the references display

Yeah, I’ve heard report of that bug in Boost before [1] [2].

Out of curiosity, what does it look like for you?

It’s not off-topic when the person in question is involved. […]

As stated in the title, the topic is concerning the AI bots that are spamming GitHub repos ^[1], not anything to do with nutomic. I personally encountered the bot in nutomic’s repo ^[2], so I simply used it as a generic example. Given this, your comment feels off-topic, imo.

Maybe a joke at the expense of StackOverflow. […]

Yeah, I figured that, but I don’t understand how it’s relevant to the topic of this post.

I’m not sure I understand the relevance of your comment. Could you explain?

[…] Who’s that […]?

I presume they are referring to @[email protected] ^[1]; nutomic is one of the main Lemmy developers ^[1.1].

Context? […] what does he have to do with this post?

If they are indeed referring to @[email protected], I presume they are mentioning nutomic because the example GitHub repository that I cited ^[3] is owned by nutomic ^[2]; that being said, specifically regarding their claim itself that nutomic is transphobic ^[4] and is a genocide denier ^[4], it is entirely off topic, imo.

I will make no comment on the veracity of the claim itself without evidence. I do not wish to speak for nutomic — I will let them speak for themself here should they wish.

Anecdotally, I have personally encountered a bug where my Linux system couldn’t handle the EDID from the monitor — so that particular model of monitor didn’t function with Linux despite it working fine on Windows.

Also seems the most useful cause you get two colors for the price of one.

Given my personal preference for the Uniball Vision Needle (not pictured), I’ll go for 1.

[…] If you don’t support imprisoning people who hold these views that directly lead to the death of many innocent people, the taking over of people’s land/homes, the destruction of democratic systems, and the elimination of entire races of people from populations, then you are inherently tolerating their beliefs.

To me, it feels like you are conflating some things here: I draw a distinction between how I try to conduct myself (and, by extension, how I think society should conduct itself), and how I think a government should conduct itself. Any common overlap, while it may theoretically draw from the same core personal beliefs, is more of a coincidence in practice, imo. Yes, I think that society should not socially tolerate any of these behaviors, and I think that society should take an active position to socially oppose them; but I don’t believe that a government should take action unless the well-being of an individual is actively under threat.

I could be wrong in my interpretation, but all of your examples seem to simply a be a difference of opinion (no matter how abhorrent and unpalatable an opinion may be). I don’t believe that one should be legally punished for a difference of opinion. The only one that may have some legal ground, in my opinion, as I currently understand your examples, is

Supporting dictatorship, authoritarianism, or totalitarianism as a concept or goal

but that would depend on how you are defining “support”.

[…] [he shouted] out a straight up neonazi propaganda channel as one of his favorites […]

Do you have a source?

I wonder if he’ll make a video (if he hasn’t already) on why he chose to switch to Linux; I’m quite interested to hear what made him decide to switch, and I’m also very interested to hear what issues, if any, he encountered along the way.

Transphobic main dev […]

Do you have a source?

I swear, that text looks both blurry and sharp at the same time.

Basically, every search engine has incorporated LLMs and are shoving them down your throat. If we are talking about tools that I would find useful I’d rather have a reverse image search. […]

So, for clarity, are you saying that a reverse image search tool is more useful to you than AI integration, yet search engines are pushing for AI integration rather than reverse image search tools, and they may not have reverse image search tools at all?