![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
If he has now got supreme power couldn’t he just declare that the president doesn’t have supreme power, and hey presto it’s gone?
If he has now got supreme power couldn’t he just declare that the president doesn’t have supreme power, and hey presto it’s gone?
Words aren’t real, we can spell them however we want. Don’t be weird.
“The new book has, for lack of a better term, completely screwed over my fanfiction”
“These books live and die by their fanfiction. For the authors not to coordinate with the fanfic writers is a disgrace”
What are hoops that you chase with a stick doing to children? Demands grow to restrict kids access to hoops that you chase with a stick
Expansionist?
Shadow boxing
" Several of the researchers are associated with public security authorities in China, a fact that “voids any notion of free informed consent”, said Yves Moreau, a professor of engineering at the University of Leuven, in Belgium, who focuses on DNA analysis. Moreau first raised concerns about the papers with Hart, MGGM’s editor-in-chief, in March 2021.
One retracted paper studies the DNA of Tibetans in Lhasa, the capital of Tibet, using blood samples collected from 120 individuals. The article stated that “all individuals provided written informed consent” and that work was approved by the Fudan University ethics committee.
But the retraction notice published on Monday stated that an ethical review “uncovered inconsistencies between the consent documentation and the research reported; the documentation was not sufficiently detailed to resolve the concerns raised”. "
Weird. So they had written consent forms for the blood samples, but the forms weren’t detailed enough(?), and anyway you can’t trust anyone associated with the Chinese gvmt? Is that what they’re saying?
This seems like weird reactionary virtue signalling.
Do you always talk down to people?
Reactionary bullshit
Attention doesn’t pay 180k tho
The Houthis are blocking Israeli ports in response to genocide.
Why were US ships going to the ports of a country actively committing genocide?
The US is now bombing a sovereign nation to stop trade sanctions on a genocide.
So not a US oil tanker then?
This whole article is just saying “some people don’t like act three. What do you think? Leave a comment bellow”.
So low effort
The power to do what? If it’s not the power to force morally good behaviour then it’s all pointless.
This post is a disaster.
It says “An experiment in 2020s incentivizing the workplace as a dot-com-era adult playground where work also” three times.
I get that it’s embedded or whatever, but reading this post was like having a stroke.
Comments are full of AI experts with wild theories about how Chat GPT works, lmao
If only we had listened to you
Gotcha. Thanks for the explanation!