You go, and read the citations.
You go, and read the citations.
Have it cite it’s source.
Essentially the joke everyone made about nfts.
Huh? It’s not my jam but in their story everyone seems to know what’s going on and consented. What’s wrong with that?
Disclaimer: I am not holding or promoting the following.
But the meme is “if you’re gonna eat a sandwich, you’d like it better if someone hadn’t fucked it first”
I think the core of the meme revolves around possession. Seeing the “sandwich” as something to attain, and possess, and consume. Indeed, I would not like someone to fuck my lunch. But a person has an independent life where their value is certainly not graded in such a way. ( Or any way, in this context)
If you are obsessed with taking something pure, and only having your influence on it, for all time, then the virgin thing matters.
Nissan leafs and toyota Prius have been around in big numbers for more than a decade.
It’s the enshitiffication that all modern cars are doing: cramming way too much tech into something that is for moving people around, not entertaining them
Right but some folks might not think about how having open blinds can cause a lot of warming as sunlight pours through
Not closing windows, but blinds.
Closing doors only helps if you close the vents too.
And hey, there could be someone reading this thread who just moved into their first place, or moved to a hot climate for the first time.
If you have spare rooms, and your ac unit is struggling or your billz be wildin, close your vents and doors for rooms you don’t use.
Also be sure to close blinds on rooms that are south facing
It’s censored on your instance
Now you just hatin’, edit after you just made some wild assumptions
Words have definitions. Real life has different situations. Those situations have different motives and results, even if they share features. Edit you can’t just declare everything violent terroristic.
It’s silly to assume that the same actions would have the same impacts on two very different types of crime, despite both of those crimes having a gun.
For example: red flag laws where family or certain professionals can bring forward action to take guns away from someone or get them certain care. This is triggered by said folks detecting or acknowledging certain concerning behaviors in someone who might carry out a mass shooting.
This wouldn’t help with someone considering a robbery, as their pattern of behavior (edit and motivation) isn’t the same.
I am not advocating for red flag laws, or discounting them. That’s not the point.
I’m aware of the basics of gun safety, and aware that having a gun elevates the charges on a crime like a robbery. Pointing a gun at anything does indeed make clear your willingness to kill.
But you dodged the point of my reply, the motive or intent of the crime.
A robbery is not terrorism, or terroristic in motive. A robbery has a cause and a goal outside of killing. I’m not saying an armed robbery isn’t an inherently violent act, and I never said that shit about “trynna scare them”. Not sure where you gathered that.
You’ve devolved to name calling, inserting thoughts for others, and dodging the point of what you’re replying to. Seems you’re about spent
“who are ready to churn out the same characters for another generation”
Edit downvotes from mickey, I mean mario
What are you on about? The motivations and end goals of an armed robbery and mass shooting are obviously and clearly different.
To help you:
A robbery tries to acquire things, and the gun is a threat they generally hope to not use (but might be pretty comfortable using).
A mass shooting is a terroristic event with the core goal of killing as many as possible.
A thief isn’t necessarily interested in killing. A mass shooter is.
Simple stuff.
He’s actually overweight in that photo for a movie role.
Gaining weight as you age is not “normal”. It is “common”.
“so many” just means the women he’s interacting with have them more often than they previously remember.
It’s their own anecdotal, subset. A sample.
They are discussing the observation they have on the women they are meeting. Not all women.
To assume they are describing all women, or further, passing some meaningful judgement on all women is an invention of the reader
If the bathroom and toilet are “dewy” the bad design falls on the house itself.
It’s a tool, not a genie.