EmasXP

TIL that Mono is a Microsoft project. I always thought it was an open source reverse engineered .NET

I miss old Opera. I want it back

Aha, I see, thank you

+1 for LXQt. But what do you mean XFCE is not ready? Never used MATE, so I cannot tell, but XFCE seemed solid when I used it

I’m still trying out different editors from time to time. I always feel like they are lacking in some way in comparison to Emacs. Like, when there’s no key binding to focus the list of references, or one cannot navigate to the beginning of a block, or one cannot navigate by subword. Let’s not forget sexp. Cannot live without it. Or marks, for that matter. Or proper clipboard history that is properly searchable. It’s like the developers has not seen the light yet. Most editors are very mouse driven, and maybe does not focus enough on actual code navigation. I’m biased of course. Though, Helix seems cool.

Side note: Even though I use Emacs, I have nothing against Vim. Heck, I even use it every now and then.

This state-o-fart user-experience will transport you to the future of user experiences

I admit. This cracked me up.

We all have different levels of insecurity. I think it’s common to not want to hurt the feelings of the ones we love

My mind was just blown. Turning off Javascript works, doesn’t it?

HTTPie

I think this happens when there’s notifications from Slack in the notification center. For some reason it does not seem to sync. Clearing in the notification center is probably going to “fix” the badge counter

The Brother printer I bought recently was easier to install on Linux than on Mac. I think that says something. Always works too

Over the years XFCE is the DE I’ve used the most. Kept getting back to it. It simply does a lot of things right. That does not mean it’s my favorite, though. There are plenty of good ones out there. LXqt is one I find to be excellent, but it does not get much attention. Enlightenment too, for that matter. Enlightenment feels like it comes from a different era, but it’s quite charming. That said, I think I’m finished with these “small” environments, and will be on KDE from now on. You get the “batteries included” experience, and things generally work very well together. Sure, maybe it’s a but more resource heavy, but I can’t say I notice.

I really like Taskito, and have been using it for quite a while. I think the widget looks very nice too, though I relied more on the notifications.

Recently switched to Microsoft To Do, simply because I realized it works more in the way I think. I make a plan for the day, and tick off the tasks I finish. Some tasks might not be finished (happens a bit too often, I admit), and those tasks will be suggested when I make a plan on the following day. The widget looks OK, not too exciting, but clean enough.

As a side note, DBeaver actually asks for confirmation if it thinks you are about to do something wonky. I think it’s quite telling just how common this mistake is. We’ve all been there

“flatsnap”. This made my day

I’ve only used Caddy as a reverse proxy in production, but on my development machine I use Caddy with php-fpm. That makes me a bit unsure if I understand your questions correctly.

For me that would look something like this:

test.example.com {
	root * var/www/html
	php_fastcgi unix//run/php/php7.4-fpm.sock
	file_server
}

(Yeah, PHP 7.4, I know)

It looks like your Docker (?) image is exposing the php-fmp socket? I did not even know that was possible, but I don’t doubt it is.

Caddy has no issues serving multiple hosts from the same server, it can even be with different php-fpm sockets. Caddy will just nod at you, maybe silently question your choice of still running PHP 7.4, but it accepts it and runs. Just make another block with a different host in the same Caddyfile, and it will work just fine.