You disgust me.

I’d assume there’d be at least someone there who’s job it is to “research” things to see if they’re to be banned or not.

Like the person who would’ve had to read the Harry Potters.

Are you aware Elon bought the title of “founder of Tesla”?

He’s not invented jack shit. Dude’s a moron.

With a term like that, it’s not weird to link Wikipedia, but I actually would’ve understood it without it as well.

But here in Finland schools aren’t in loco parentis for the trip to and from school. Only while school’s in. That’s why for instance schools here couldn’t sanction pupils for fighting on the way home.

Who’s “them” and what is “the test”?

You needed a licence to drive a bicycle?

Oh. Easy.

Biphasic dose response.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0269749113004235

Also known as hormesis.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hormesis

Small/normal doses of cannabis can perk you up. Large ones sedate. Reasonable doses of alcohol give party energy. Larger ones make you go to bed.

Same with caffeine.

And everything, really.

That’s the point. They’re ridiculing the hypocrisy, not the sexism.

Wouldn’t know, don’t remember that ever happening.

Every group has its idiots, but I will admit it felt like a higher class of idiot.

Oh that’s unlocked some memories. Wow what a flashback.

Not saying not to do what you say but Jewish population in America is only 2% this is not enough to make a change

Israel has a population of ~9.75 million.

The US has a population of ~335 million people.

As of 2020, the American Jewish population is estimated at 7.5 million people, accounting for 2.4% of the total US population.

If All American Jews managed to convince just 1.3 Israeli’s, that’d be the entire population influenced.

But perhaps you’re saying 2% isn’t enough to affect change internally within the US? Probably not true either, 2% is 1/50 people. And as we all know from tinfoil wearing conspiracy nuts, Jews have disproportionate representation in politics. (I do not know or care whether that statement has any veracity; I’m saying it sarcastically.)

“You can’t censor Nazis without jeopardising everything journalism is about.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope

And you can and should, btw, censor Nazis. Or you’ll end up like Dumbfuckistan.

Edit: What happens if Australia’s equivalent of Donald Trump gets in office and enact the policy mentioned above?

See because they have reasonable limits on supporting fascism publicly, there’s less of it going around, so they don’t exactly have an equivalent demented child-raping fascist to vote for.

It’s also more complex than “they sanctioned someone who is adamant about being a literal nazi, so we have to go show support to fascism”.

Germany learned their lesson 80 years ago. The US thinks anything goes. And how is that going, recently?

Even with the absolutist free speech the US is known for, there are still reasonable limitations to it. Like fighting words and yelling fire in a crowded theatre.

You understand things are complex yet advocate for something absolute? O.o

“This number is meaningless”

That’s what you said.

Even if it’s just of verified deaths, then you can still double the victim number, and still have 35% of the victims be women and children.

So is the number truly meaningless, or are you saying “it’s meaningless” just as an attempt to downplay the genocide Israel is committing?

That’s a bad analogy.

Fuck man, they went a little overboard with the propaganda at your school and left out all the maths?

“My support of political ideologies which directly propose genocide is completely non-violent, trust me bro.”