• 0 Posts
  • 221 Comments
Joined 2 年前
Cake day: 2023年12月14日
  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.mltoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•Jellyfin over the internetEnglish
    2·
    4 天前

    Imo that’s perfectly fine and not idiotic if you have a static IP, no ISP blocked ports / don’t care about using alt ports, and don’t mind people who find your domain knowing your IP.

    I did basically that when I had a fiber line but then I added a local haproxy in front to handle additional subdomains. I feel like people gravitate towards recommending that because it works regardless of the answers to the other questions, even their security tolerance if recommending access only over VPN.

    I have CGNAT now so reverse proxy in the cloud is my only option, but at least I’m free to reconfigure my LAN or uproot everything and plant it on any other LAN and it’ll all be fine.

  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.mltoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•Jellyfin over the internetEnglish
    1·
    4 天前

    This is 99% my setup, just with a traefik container attached to my wifeguard container.

    Can recommend especially because I can move apartments any time, not care about CGNAT (my current situation which I predicted would be the case), and easily switch to any backup by sticking my boxes on any network with DHCP that can reach the Internet (like a 4G hotspot or a nanobeam pointed at a public wifi down the road) in a pinch without reconfiguring anything.

  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.mltoFediverse@lemmy.world•Bluesky is more open than you think.English
    41·
    9 天前

    Is there any way to connect the bsky android app to the atproto.africa relay or a third party appview that uses the atproto.africa relay? I wouldn’t mind using bsky more if there was a clone of the android app that doesn’t use the bsky relay/appview. Looking at whtwnd it appears to be just web and not native apps?

    I would like to host my own PDS and access bsky through a native app using third party relay+appview, but I haven’t seen a way to do this yet.

  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.mltoTechnology@lemmy.world•This new 40TB hard drive from Seagate is just the beginning—50TB is coming fast!English
    2·
    29 天前

    Yes this and also scrubs and smart tests. I have 6 14TB spinning drives and a long smart test takes roughly a week, so running 2 at a time takes close to a month to do all 6 and then it all starts over again, so for half to 75% of the time, 2 of my drives are doing smart tests. Then there’s scrubs which I do monthly. I would consider larger drives if it didn’t mean that my smart/scrub schedule would take more than a month. Rebuilds aren’t too bad, and I have double redundancy for extra peace of mind but I also wouldn’t want that taking much longer either

  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.mlto3DPrinting@lemmy.world•"Stringy" partsEnglish
    5·
    1 个月前

    Since you want to avoid supports and cleanup, what I would do is modify the model to flatten out the inside of the dome. You can do it easily in most slicers by adding a cylinder part and squishing it until it’s more like a disc.

    A flat roof to the inside of the dome will cause it to switch to bridging for that section which won’t be perfect but will be a lot better than stringing, especially if you play around with thick bridges.

  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.mltoShowerthoughts@lemmy.world•There should be something like a flea market where hobby gardeners go to share sprouted seedsEnglish
    3·
    2 个月前

    Our local farmers market unfortunately only really allows vendors and requires an application process (and a sales tax license) - ie you can’t just hang out and trade seedlings and stuff with people without paying a booth fee (of ~$300) so it’s really only for people running a business. There’s also a fine for every day you’re late to your booth so it’s not feasible to pay for a space if you’re not going to show up and sell stuff all season long.

    You also can’t apply for a booth later than like 4 months before the season (applications are closed in like Dec) so it’s really not geared towards someone who isn’t selling lots of product.

  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.mltoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•Self hosted place check-insEnglish
    5·
    2 个月前

    Immich is pretty good for this if you take pictures at each location. It has a global map that shows all your photos with a heatmap-style display and a drawer that shows a grid of the photos within your viewport as you can and zoom around. It doesn’t seem like you can view a specific album on the map currently but you can at least filter the map to favorites or a date range.

  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.mltoOpenStreetMap community@lemmy.ml•Edits to OSM now give wrong directions in OsmAnd.English
    0·
    2 个月前

    No problem! I don’t really do much road mapping so I’m still figuring it out, I do mostly just sidewalks and parking lots, but I’m noticing some intersections near me also have some messed up lane configurations.

    Another thing that might help is ab-street, if you download the desktop version you can import an area using an overpass query and view it using the viewer program bundled with ab-street, and it lets you click on segments and view where the turns connect from and to. It might not be 100% accurate but it’s another thing that helps to debug. I found that a road near me shows up in ab-street with the wrong number of lanes which pointed me to an issue.

  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.mltoOpenStreetMap community@lemmy.ml•Edits to OSM now give wrong directions in OsmAnd.English
    0·
    2 个月前

    I have no clue about the whole problem, but I looked at what I think is the first issue where it looks like it tells you to turn left where the sliplane splits to go right into the shred right parking lot.

    My guess is that turn:lanes is supposed to be tagged immediately before the intersection it applies to, and since the turn:lanes are tagged on the way before the sliplane attaches, it’s applying left|none|none to the sliplane junction, where it sees 2 outgoing ways and applies “left” to old Shakopee (going straight) and probably “none” to the sliplane. I would try removing the turn:lanes from the old Shakopee section before the sliplane but keep it on the way that is actually connected to the main intersection there.

    I also noticed that there is a turn restriction for coming out of the shred right sliplane entrance and then turning 180° to go eastbound on Shakopee. Since that sliplane entrance is one way, I don’t think that turn restriction is necessary or really helps, and it might be confusing to osmand. Without that turn restriction, I don’t think it would be necessary to have the old Shakopee split into 2 ways before the sliplane and after up until the intersection, so merging those 2 segments of old Shakopee (immediately before the sliplane entrance to shred right and up until the intersection itself) might simplify things.

    So I guess that’s 2 ideas that I think might fix the issue. Hopefully that works and can be applied to some of the other issues, I’m not sure about the intersection itself, I’ll have to look at it closer later.