Raise as in how you raise a wine glass to drink from it afterwards.
Aedis
- 0 Posts
- 15 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: November 11th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
3·3 months agoDerp. My bad.
What bothers me most about the date is the Facebook post is from Apr. 21st 2022, but the document says 2024. How is this sovcit time travelling ?
11·4 months agoThat’s the fun part about being in a place where you can hold a discussion. Some people don’t agree with you, but they can still see the benefits of the option you are talking about or even agree that they are a great solution for now.
72·6 months agoThe attacks by Iranian backed Hamas against Israel. Sources:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_support_for_Hamas
Disclaimer: I’m not stating support for one group or another, but the truth is necessary for a good opinion and discussion .
It’s entirely plausible that unbeknownst to us ai has developed within a harmonic cube congruency and thus what we assume to be 25 by years ago by our fake queer Greenwich time is actually 25 years in the future for ai following the harmonic influence of the 96 hour day cycle that everyone else is too stupid to notice. Within everything having 4 phases you should be skeptical of those who tell you that time travel isn’t possible for the 4 phases of time itself are forward, backward, up and down, anyone who tells you different is trying to coherce your mind straight into hell by saying the opposite, they are too stuck in their word world to realize that you have moved past that into the real-world.
Found the Microsoft employee.
I believe the proper terminology is Badonkadonks
FTFY
5·9 months agoAt least what I see with this experiment/article is that is overly verbose, he takes a long time to get to the point. And then when he does his methodology shows an experiment that cannot be verified. Even when something is “subjective” we can still draw conclusions from it if we set up proper non-subjective ways of evaluating the results we see (ie. Rubrics). The fact that he doesn’t really say what leads him to say in detail what is a “terrible/v. bad/bad/good result” is a massive red flag in his method.
After seeing that, I no longer read the rest of it. Any conclusions drawn from a flawed methodology are inherently fallacies or hearsay.
If in any case it is further explained in the article and that somehow refutes what I’ve postulated later on, then I would have to say that the article is poorly written.
All this to say… I agree with you, not worth the read.
41·9 months agoWhat? Ballmer hasn’t had anything to do with msft since 2014 man.
12·11 months agoMissed opportunity for toiletarian paper
This doesn’t make that behavior any less scummy, but have you tried using any Google website on a browser that isn’t chrome?