Michael@lemmy.perthchat.org to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 year agoJapan Decides That Copyright Doesn't Apply to AI Trainingtechnomancers.aiexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1154arrow-down143cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1111arrow-down1external-linkJapan Decides That Copyright Doesn't Apply to AI Trainingtechnomancers.aiMichael@lemmy.perthchat.org to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 year agomessage-square39fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareRGB3x3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoBut would copyright law not cover the creation of a piece of art that is derivative or a copy of another piece without proper credit? A human artist does not violate copyright merely for studying a piece of art. Only by replicating it do they violate the law. Why should these AI models not be covered in the same way?
But would copyright law not cover the creation of a piece of art that is derivative or a copy of another piece without proper credit?
A human artist does not violate copyright merely for studying a piece of art. Only by replicating it do they violate the law.
Why should these AI models not be covered in the same way?