• Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you go to Mars you can land and explored all possibilities inherent to being on the ground (including, most importantly, using the water ice from the south pole).

    Venus on the other hand is a ball of rock wrapped in a dense and hot acid soup: you’de have to beat way worse technical challenges for, maybe, being able to locally extract from the athmosphere chemical compounds which you can just as easilly make on Earth (it’s mostly CO2 and sulfuric acid, though apparently it has 20 ppm of water).

    It would make more sense to just have a moon base.

    • unceme@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t wanna defend the guy but he did say floating colony, the atmosphere about 1 km up from the surface sits at earthlike temperatures and pressures-- astronauts would only need a breathing mask and some light skin protection as opposed to a pressure suit which is a major advantage.

      • DrGumby@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        May be a silly question, but how would you go about making a floating colony? I dont think we have the tech to keep a city perpetually floating.