• WarmSoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If all electric cars are just going to be subscription bullshit, I’m sorry, I won’t be driving electric.

    • jetsetdorito@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even ICE manufacturers have been including hardware that software disabled for a while

      • smallaubergine@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I got an OBDeleven for my 2015 GTI so I could unlock stuff and customize. Enabled rolling down the windows with the key fob, being able to display the engine oil temp in the dash and also setting the accelerator pedal curve to linear.

      • BobKerman3999@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Audi had been doing this for years and they even disable stuff if you sell your car to another private person. One of my friends bought a used Audi and everything was disabled so he installed a cracked version of the infotainment software and now the only thing that doesn’t work is the fingerprint unlock.

      • falkerie71@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Subscribe to enable your BMW seat heater! They definitely require periodic software updates and is absolutely NOT a blatant money grab

      • finder@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are some manufacturers that do not do this garbage, or at least not often. I’ve heard good things about Hyundai specifically.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          For now they have customer goodwill to win back after nearly a decade of building cars that practically fell apart in a year or 2 in the late 00s and early 10s.

          They’ll catch up to the others in anti-consumer practices soon, but for now they’re a good choice if you don’t particularly care for performance or ride quality.

        • _stranger_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tesla got rid of the heater subscription bullshit in 2021. Now, the only thing locked behind a paywall is internet related stuff (sentry over mobile, streaming media access, etc.), the performance boost, and FSD.

          • Jmr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            But if the car is completely capable of habe that performance, why should people pay for it.

            • _stranger_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh I’m just correcting the article. Facts are better than fiction for conversations about reality.

    • holo_nexus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      It won’t just be electric cars, it’ll be all new model cars from manufacturing companies. At least until ICE is phased out.

      • Jode@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        More like, until the Chinese weasel their way into the US market with cheaper-than-used cars to undercut the legacy auto makers. 10 years or so, it’ll happen. And the big 3 will be begging for bailouts again. That is unless they smarten up and remember what made Ford what it is today.

        • Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re already doing that in some parts of the world. Then when they get sizeable market share, they emulated what the previous car makers do. It’s just not an improvement. It’s more of the same, only the manufacturer is different.

      • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that’s true. I wonder if the market for older cars has been going up yet.

    • BirdsWithBeefyArms@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a Rivian and it works great with no subscription. The only thing you can add via Sub is a hotspot, which seems reasonable to me.

      • zurohki@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m okay with being charged a monthly subscription for something that has an ongoing cost, like mobile data. So long as I can still hotspot my phone and access ‘premium connectivity’ features over wifi, that is.

        • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah about those ‘premium connectivity features’… one of them is warning you that the road you’re about to drive on has a traffic jam. And no, you can’t have it use your phone’s internet connection and you also can’t do CarPlay or Android Auto.

          For me real time traffic isn’t a premium feature or an ad on. It’s table stakes. And it should be free. Worse, not having it already almost makes your car hard to sell secondhand. Imagine what it’ll be like several years ago when people start selling Rivians?

    • XEAL@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      At some point, there will be practically nothing else to drive…

        • nxfsi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          The average lemming:

          • concerned about online privacy
          • strongly against digital surveillance
          • rides exclusively public transit where there is surveillance everywhere
          • coltorl@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is surveillance everywhere outside, even having your own car doesn’t protect you from having your privacy encroached. That’s why I never go outside.

          • TheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There are fundamental differences between physical and digital surveillance, namely when you are in a public space there is no expectation of privacy because there are other people there looking at you. When there are other people there that can actually see you, a camera also watching doesn’t make much of a difference.

            • notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              it does

              people usually doesn’t remember you unless you do some weird shit but once recorded, it will stay for the rest of eternity

              • unceme@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you’re talking about standard security cameras usually the footage will get completely overwritten after afeew days unless there was an incident to prompt review of the footage-- and even then it usually gets deleted at some point. Its not like with social media data gathering where they’re collecting all that information in order to build a personal profile of everyone-- security cameras just exist to review incidents that happen in the public realm and there’s no real incentive for a public transit agency to track every single person that appears on their cameras.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            By ‘surveillance,’ do you mean a bus security camera to make sure no one is stabbing the driver? Because I’m pretty sure most of us don’t have much of a problem with that. It’s comprehensive government surveillance that is the problem.

            • nxfsi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Unfortunately, “camera to make sure no one stabs the driver” is the exact tool used by “comprehensive government surveillance”. It’s something we’re forced to accept.

          • unceme@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s cameras everywhere watching the road too if you really care that much and you better believe your car model and license plate is a much more reliable form of identifying information than a blurry face on a bus security camera.

            • nxfsi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              When does “you should minimize your physical footprint so that you are harder to profile by bad people” suddenly become “just stay inside at all times and never go out”?

              Even with digital privacy, nothing is 100% effective.

      • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure there will, always. Fix it yourself jalopies aren’t going away. Get yourself a cheap-o used junker and mod it to be electric, if you can’t or won’t use ICE. DIY isn’t just 3d printers and FOSS. Or get a bicycle and mod it into an e-bike.

  • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Good. There should be no such thing as unserviced features that are physically present in a product and locked out against its owner. Not in cars or anything.

      • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because it’s blatant rent seeking.

        Look, if there’s an actual service feature that continually costs money to provide (eg.: a cell connection for distant remote start, GPS nav map updates, etc), it’s charging a reasonable subscription fee for that is totally acceptable. But charging ongoing fees for fixed features like heated seats is 100% bullshit.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Utilizing multiple connections to the power supply, BIOS SPI chip, and SVI2 bus, the researchers performed a voltage fault injection attack on the MCU-Z’s Platform Security Processor.

    “They allow an attacker to decrypt the encrypted NVMe storage and access private user data such as the phonebook, calendar entries, etc.”

    “Hacking the embedded car computer could allow users to unlock these features without paying,” the TU Berlin researchers add.

    In an email to Tom’s Hardware, one of the researchers clarified that not all Tesla software upgrades are accessible, so it remains to be seen if those premium options will also be ripe for picking.

    Another consequence is that the exploit can “extract an otherwise vehicle-unique hardware-bound RSA key used to authenticate and authorize a car in Tesla’s internal service network.”

    The TU Berlin team (consisting of PhD students Christian Werling, Niclas Kühnapfel, and Hans Niklas Jacob, along with security researcher Oleg Drokin) will present their findings next week (August 9) at the Blackhat conference in Las Vegas, where we hope to hear more about all the feature upgrades that are accessible.


    I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • sprl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    A subscription for hardware is such bullshit, I hope this trend dies.

  • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Literally stealing the food from the plates of those hard-working millionaires/billionaires (if you ask them). How will they ever continue to float to the top of the net worth leaderboard now?

  • csm10495@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The title seems much more interesting than it is. I doubt most people have the ability to perform this type of exploit. It would be more interesting if a group would charge X to unlock it for you.

    • MrShankles@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right? Probably for attention grabbing, cause they do say the same flaw exists in zen2 and zen3, and the article is by no means slamming AMD for it. But the title does come off that way

  • EmperorHenry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cool! Now work on exploits for those paywalled features of BMW cars and Ford cars.

    If you pay for something it’s yours by right. You should be able to use the entire thing, because you physically have it now.