Per my original post, if you’re correct, then they’re lying to the government about their intent to use it within the next six months, and will have to submit additional paperwork with a fictitious unforeseen reason for the six months delay to push it back.

It’s not clear to me whether you’re saying that I missed something in my original post (which I might have, like I said), or that they’re lying to the government and planning to do so again (which is possible I suppose), or if you’re just disregarding my post and providing an unrelated guess.

I also just woke up minutes ago so maybe I’m just misunderstanding you.