• farcaller@fstab.sh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you drop the projector, then airpods already do it better when paired with the watch. There’s no point in such a device at all, then.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Airpods don’t have a camera though. 90% of my photos are of things I need to remember, like a shopping list or a specific product I need to get Having to dig out (or find) my phone to do that is a pain.

      And I don’t have Airpods because I’d lose them, one by one, and the replacements are twice the price as another pair of perfectly workable Bluetooth headphones.

      • efstajas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        If they wanted to companies could put a camera in a smart watch easily. Samsung was doing it ages ago.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The time before I lose a pair of glasses is inversely proportional to how much I pay for them. If I spent $400 on glasses they would likely disappear off my face before I left the store

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Sunglasses are very easy to lose.

            I’m considering a prescription pair because those are less likely to be lost.

            I just wish they weren’t meta linked.