MJKee9@lemmy.one to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoThe male penis's head is designed to remove other males' semen from the vagina during sex... how does that make you feel?lockNSFWmessage-squaremessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up116arrow-down146file-text
arrow-up1-30arrow-down1message-squareThe male penis's head is designed to remove other males' semen from the vagina during sex... how does that make you feel?lockNSFWMJKee9@lemmy.one to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square59fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarejeffw@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up35arrow-down7·1 year agoIt makes me feel uncomfortable that someone would actually believe something so fuckin stupid
minus-squareMJKee9@lemmy.oneOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down12·1 year agohttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/147470490400200105#:~:text=The human penis%2C with a,back over%2Funder the glans.
minus-squareadroit balloon@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down12·1 year agoso you just found some crazy study online by some academic kooks and, rather than apply an ounce of critical thought, you just believed it. smh
minus-squarejeffw@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down9·edit-21 year agoInterestingly, the main author is respected https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_G._Gallup Edit: not saying I buy the premise of the article though Edit 2: every reply from the above commenter gets 5 upvotes in 2 minutes, while all my comments get 5 downvotes in 2 minutes… nice job being subtle lol
minus-squareadroit balloon@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down7·edit-21 year agothat doesn’t really mean much with regard to the validity of the study, though
minus-squarejeffw@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down8·edit-21 year agoAgain, that’s not what my point is. I’m just disputing the characterization you made Edit: every reply from the above commenter gets 5 upvotes in 2 minutes, while all my comments get 5 downvotes in 2 minutes… nice job being subtle
minus-squarejeffw@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down9·edit-21 year agoThe comment called the authors “kooks.” I am disputing that characterization. As you say, this has nothing to do with the study. Edit: 5 downvotes in 2 minutes… wow, is this breaking any rules that the person has so many accounts and manipulates votes?
It makes me feel uncomfortable that someone would actually believe something so fuckin stupid
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/147470490400200105#:~:text=The human penis%2C with a,back over%2Funder the glans.
so you just found some crazy study online by some academic kooks and, rather than apply an ounce of critical thought, you just believed it.
smh
Interestingly, the main author is respected
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_G._Gallup
Edit: not saying I buy the premise of the article though
Edit 2: every reply from the above commenter gets 5 upvotes in 2 minutes, while all my comments get 5 downvotes in 2 minutes… nice job being subtle lol
that doesn’t really mean much with regard to the validity of the study, though
Again, that’s not what my point is. I’m just disputing the characterization you made
Edit: every reply from the above commenter gets 5 upvotes in 2 minutes, while all my comments get 5 downvotes in 2 minutes… nice job being subtle
deleted by creator
The comment called the authors “kooks.” I am disputing that characterization. As you say, this has nothing to do with the study.
Edit: 5 downvotes in 2 minutes… wow, is this breaking any rules that the person has so many accounts and manipulates votes?
deleted by creator