Perhaps I’ve misunderstood how Lemmy works, but from what I can tell Lemmy is resulting in fragmentation between communities. If I’ve got this wrong, or browsing Lemmy wrong, please correct me!

I’ll try and explain this with an example comparison to Reddit.

As a reddit user I can go to /r/technology and see all posts from any user to the technology subreddit. I can interact with any posts and communicate with anyone on that subreddit.

In Lemmy, I understand that I can browse posts from other instances from Beehaw, for example I could check out /c/[email protected], /c/[email protected], or many of the other technology communities from other instances, but I can’t just open up /c/technology in Beehaw and have a single view across the technology community. There could be posts I’m interested in on the technology@slrpnk instance but I wouldn’t know about it unless I specifically look at it, which adds up to a horrible experience of trying to see the latest tech news and conversation.

This adds up to a huge fragmentation across what was previously a single community.

Have I got this completely wrong?

Do you think this will change over time where one community on a specific instance will gain the market share and all others will evaporate away? And if it does, doesn’t that just place us back in the reddit situation?

EDIT: commented a reply here: https://beehaw.org/comment/288898. Thanks for the discussion helping me understand what this is (and isnt!)

  • masterspace@kbin.social
    2·
    1 year ago

    That’s an upside, but it’s not necessarily a “good” thing to be fragmented if it means you don’t have the network effects to make a satisfying community.

    End of the day a lot of Reddit’s value came from its popularity.

    • PabloDiscobar@kbin.social
      2·
      1 year ago

      End of the day a lot of Reddit’s value came from its popularity.

      Value to who? Not to me. I saw subs I liked nosedive because of popularity. I saw the network effect force me to unsubscribe and search elsewhere.

      I can even give you an estimate of the number of subscribers required to kill a sub, between 70k and 300k, depending on the theme of the sub. This is when the peanut gallery joins in and the spectators become the showrunners.

      But value to the shareholders? Sure! More people, more ad revenues.

      • LChitman@kbin.social
        1·
        1 year ago

        Ugh, yes, it’s unfortunate that popularity ruined so many subs. We’ve all watched a tonne of them turn into generic repost mills over the years.

      • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
        1·
        1 year ago

        There’s a sweet spot. A dead forum is of no use to anyone. Reddit had a good few years where there were enough users to have a good exchange of information, and not a sea of low effort posts. I think it all changed when they started advertising their app and “new reddit” on Facebook.

        • PabloDiscobar@kbin.social
          1·
          1 year ago

          Well, define “dead”, because in your terms beehaw/lemmy is dead and still everyone wants to be a part of it.

          People need to fight this fear of missing out. There are people here who suggest that we should run bots to mirror reddit. That would be a disaster.

          • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
            1·
            1 year ago

            because in your terms beehaw/lemmy is dead

            Huh? No, I’d say the opposite, the fediverse is in the sweet spot right now.

    • nude@kbin.social
      0·
      1 year ago

      Hard disagree.

      Tiktok is popular. Its hold very little value to lots of people though. Same thing with twitter.

      For me, reddits value was from its popularity amongst a certain demographic, which was largely the techies. At this point enough techies have come over to the fediverse that so far its meeting or exceeding the reddit itch.

      Id rather a community of 10,000 people who are mostly tech driven than a community of 10,000,000 with 10,000 techy types. Popular reddit posts had thousands of the same played out comments and comment chains languishing at the bottom of threads. Popular threads on the fediverse so far have people engaging in conversation without a collapsed thread of 4000 ignored posts at the bottom.

      Popularity means nothing when its mostly people with nothing worthwhile to say except the same played out jokes and memes

      • myke_tuna@kbin.social
        0·
        1 year ago

        I agree wholeheartedly with this. Recently, I was subbed to overlapping sources on kbin and Lemmy and I realized I had to cut the fat. I see similar posts covering the same event in multiple places, but I’m not going to seriously engage in all of them.

        Basically, I don’t need to find the biggest one that has everything on it or create one mega aggregate, I just need to find the right place for me. Some people seem to want to be plugged into this 1 big nexus of every permutation of a topic, but I don’t see a reason for it.

        If you extend that thinking out to the internet as a whole, you’d need to be part of these forums and this subreddit and this Facebook group and these discords or you’re gonna miss out on something. But most of it is just noise at a certain point.