There are few things quite as emblematic of late stage capitalism than the concept of “planned obsolescence”.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Huh? I have an ipad mini and since two-three years ago it’s as useful as a brick, Apple doesn’t allow me to install any app because they require a newer os version (that’s not available for the model)

    By contrast my much older nexus 7 can still use most apps that I want

    • hoodatninja@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It can’t run everything obviously but the fact that my nearly 10 year old iPad can handle video streaming still and these schools have bricked laptops after 3 years is ridiculous.

      • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those Chromebooks aren’t bricked. They simply don’t get chrome updates anymore, even if it’s just Linux+Chrome and updates could continue forever without any real effort from Google

        For security issues they can’t give to students unsupported hardware. The discontinued iPad would go in the same e-waste bin, because it’s not like android where browsers will continue to get updates for years and years

            • hoodatninja@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well for starters it wasn’t purchased by or for schools so no. But even if it was, it gets far more than 3 years of support. I think 5 is somewhat reasonable if we’re just going to accept this sort of behavior.

              Either way the comparison is not really apt. Mobile devices are far worse about this than PC’s. You should instead compare a macbook (or a cheap windows machine), which gets security updates for 7-10 years. Google knows their devices are very popular for school computers, so to treat them like mobile devices and enforce the terrible standards that comes with is pernicious.

              • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                you again chose a macbook for an example, some macs released in 2017 got less than 5 years of OS updates and became ewaste very quickly

                choose a different company than apple for your “long time support” examples…

                • hoodatninja@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  It was one example, and if you’ll notice I said “or just any affordable windows machine,” I don’t know why you’re ignoring that.

                  As for the 2017 releases getting less than 5 years support, I have never heard of this nor am I finding any examples. Here is the Monterey (apple’s current OS version) compatibility list, which consists of computers as far back as 2013. So I’d be curious to see what you’re referencing. Catalina, the previous OS which dates back even further with compatibility, had security updates until about 8mo ago as well.

                  3 years is unacceptable on Google’s part and Apple hasn’t come anywhere close to that.