The Vilnius summit could have achieved much more, if only the political willpower had allowed it

  • 332@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, I agree that’s probably how this is going to play out; Ukraine cedes some territory to Russia and is allowed to join NATO, hopefully safeguarding it against further Russian imperialism in the future.

    In the meantime, we should of course keep supporting Ukraine as much as we can to give them as strong of a position in these potential future negotiations as possible.

    • xuxebiko@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      As long as Russia retains even a toehold in Ukraine, NATO’ll say conflict is not resolved, so can’t talk of membership. Even in the Vilnius meeting, NATO did not even promise to start negotiations as soon as the war is over, They just said “Ukraine will become a member of NATO” which is just showing a carrot at the end of a long stick to keep the donkey moving. They have no intention to end the war. Just prolong it or freeze the conflict.

      There is no minimizing how self-servng and cowardly NATO is being at the cost of Ukrainian lives.

      • Djennik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Membership can come quickly: Finland became a member rather swiftly. I figure most members would want the war the end as soon as possible because it’s a moneydrain. European members are not eager to prolong a war just outside their borders.

        The situation is different for the US of course. A prolonged war is in their best interest as it weakens Russia over time. China can’t rely on a weak ally if shit hits the fan in Taiwan. Ukraine is also a prime example on how willing the US is to support allies in a long-term proxy war.