seasonone@opidea.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoInsurance Company Flew a Drone to Take Photos of Man's House and Canceled His Policypetapixel.comexternal-linkmessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up1110arrow-down12cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1108arrow-down1external-linkInsurance Company Flew a Drone to Take Photos of Man's House and Canceled His Policypetapixel.comseasonone@opidea.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square70fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareMrMonkey@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·2 years agoThe same reason flying airplanes isn’t “criminal trespassing”. Satellite and aerial photography happen really high up. No insurance company used a small toy drone to fly 50’ over his property for pictures.
minus-squareBetty White In HD@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoYou are being downvoted but this is the case in the US. Public airspace is public airspace. Source: fly drones recreationally and for money.
minus-squareMrMonkey@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoPeople downvote things they don’t want to be true. It’s strange. It doesn’t work that way.
minus-squareMatt Shatt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 years agoNot even if we downvote extra hard?
The same reason flying airplanes isn’t “criminal trespassing”. Satellite and aerial photography happen really high up.
No insurance company used a small toy drone to fly 50’ over his property for pictures.
You are being downvoted but this is the case in the US. Public airspace is public airspace.
Source: fly drones recreationally and for money.
People downvote things they don’t want to be true.
It’s strange. It doesn’t work that way.
Not even if we downvote extra hard?