• tyler@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    At least cheugy is a new word. All these fucking morons literally redefining “giving” and it’s absolutely terrible. It doesn’t sound good. It just makes you sound idiotic and like you don’t know English.

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I believe giving actually comes from 90s gay/drag culture, and like most of these isn’t really as obtuse as it seems. It’s just word omission. It’s just shorthand for “it’s giving me thoughts of” or “it’s giving me memories of”, basically (okay, admittedly I’m extracting a little bit here).

      Here’s an example that I hope helps: imagine your friend or romantic partner comes to you wearing a new tweed jacket they’ve excited about, but all you can see when you look at it is memories of your tweed-clad college professor. You might respond with “i dunno, it’s giving college prof,” which is just shorthand for “I dunno, it’s giving me flashbacks to memories of my college professor.”

      Personally that seems a fairly functional evolution of language in the way it always evolves, not the degradation you seem to be finding, but of course I can only offer my own singular opinion on the topic, so do with that what you want

      edit: typos

    • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They didn’t redefine giving, it’s literally being used for its original definition. Just add “energy” or “vibes” at the end of the sentence and it clarifies exactly how it’s used. If someone sees your outfit and says “It’s giving Beyoncé” -> “it’s giving Beyoncé energy”, your outfit is reminding them of Beyoncé. As in it is providing/offering said Beyoncé-like energy, aka one of the original definitions of giving something.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        they literally redefined it. It no longer means to ’ : presented as a gift : bestowed without compensation ’ or ‘particular, specified’ or ’ : immediately present in experience ’ they’re using it as “it gives me the energy of” which already HAD A DEFINITION. THAT’S WHAT VIBE MEANS.

        That’s not the original definition of ‘giving’ something, i have no clue where you got that from.

        Bunch of morons downvoting too, bet y’all saying giving a hundred times a day. fucking idiots.

        • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Those were not the only original definitions of giving by a long shot. Another original definition was to provide, offer, impart, communicate, or pass on something, (hence the phrase “giving off” which has been around for a long time, example: it’s giving off radiation), etc. It’s not gen Z’s fault you don’t know all the definitions of giving.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah if used in that manner you have to put a word after it. Not doing so is redefining it