• Tekhne@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, practically speaking the domain name should have no effect on access time. DNS has so many layers of caching that as long as SOMEONE has accessed the website nearby (including you), the domain lookup will be local and therefore fast.

    Anyway, DNS lookup times, even slow ones, are still not going to be noticable to the end use originally.

    • Knightfall@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, I meant the instance itself. The server. The one who runs lemmy.ca is here in Canada with me.

      It’s like when playing a game; You choose servers closet to you for the lowest ping time.

      The other reason I neglected to mention was I like to support local. 😎

      • erwan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It makes a difference for a game, but it’s not really significant for a website.

        The server load and resources will have a much bigger impact on performances than geographic proximity.

        • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          And you spread that server load by selecting different servers. While what you’re saying is technically true, in a practical sense if everyone picked a more local server that would be one way to achieve what you’re saying.

            • ziggurism@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              you don’t need a uniform distribution. if the server distribution mirrors the population distribution (and why wouldn’t it?), that will still achieve the desired effect.