• IDatedSuccubi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Chrome defaultism, and so websites are usually made for Chrome, often disregarding testing on Firefox completely, and so they work a bit worse here and there

    Also no Google connectivity

    • Anemia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dragged my feet for a long time before switching from chrome to firefox a year or two ago for that exact reason. When I actually did switch it was practically seamless, I haven’t run in to any website that has been problematic on firefox but not on chrome. The only thing i dislike is that i haven’t found a way to have a custom newtab-page but still be able to directly input text to the navbar, so i always have to do ctrl+t -> ctrl-a.

      • bearded_zero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        By custom new tab what are you looking for? You can make the new tab display your home page, I think a blank page, and with extensions you can make it do almost anything with a new tab.

    • Riyria@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Huh, I haven’t really noticed any differences since making the switch. What do you mean by google connectivity?

      • FeatherConstrictor@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Chrome browser will let you log in with your Google account which means things like passwords that are saved to your Google account will auto fill

          • eeeeyayyyy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Speaking of Firefox sync, Firefox has this bug when you importing your passwords from other browsers, it doesn’t sync to your account. Only your manually inputted logins will be synced.

            • Ilandar@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You have been able to import and export data between browsers for years. This is not an unknown or difficult to access feature.

              • FeatherConstrictor@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m a Firefox user and pretty tech savvy and I really didn’t know it was possible to port my passwords from Google password manager into Firefox. In any case I use LastPass as my password manager, but the point is this isn’t common knowledge for the average person and sounds just like an extra step/hassle. Just trying to be devil’s advocate and answer the “why don’t people just switch” question.

        • Riyria@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ohhhh, I didn’t even consider that being a deal breaker for some people, but I’m pretty sure Mozilla will let you transfer all your saved passwords from chrome.

          • Ilandar@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes of course it will. I don’t know what rock these people are living under where they think they can’t export/import data between browsers. It’s a basic feature in every major browser.

    • edgarallenpwn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What sites have issues with Firefox? I’ve been using firefox exclusively since 06 besides trying chrome for 2009-2010 and never had any issues. Not saying they don’t exist but it seems like a very small amount that won’t function at all.

      • Ilandar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        People always bring this up like it’s a major issue to avoid Firefox and it’s just not even remotely true. I’m a long-term Firefox user like you and I can count on one hand the number of sites I’ve had problems with over the many years I’ve been browsing. For those very rare cases, I just use Brave to access the site. Problem solved. This idea that if the alternative isn’t 100% perfect, it is therefore completely unusable and the only realistic option is returning to big tech surveillance just needs to die already.

      • IDatedSuccubi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Anything containing WebGL and anything containing complex CSS/JS animations comes to mind, also Canvas (even though it rarely used, still lags like a motherfucker), Firefox really suffers in that regard, but they recently promised that they will fix it; and I remind you that because of hardware decoder legal ussues Firefox sucked very hard at 4K and 120 Hz YouTube on Linux for a long time too

        There are others, commonly created because Firefox focuses on privacy, and so, for example, all internal website timers can only count by 0.1 seconds because anything less will open you to tracking vunerabilities, often settings sacrifice performance for data safety like this