• Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well, sorta.

        You can say that the War In Ukraine was not natural (definitelly man-made and entirelly avoidable) and the imposition of Sanctions on a oil producing nation was not natural (it was a choice, even if the only reasonable one), plus all the increase in the money supply and decrease in the cost of debt from ZIRP which devaluated money (hence inflated the currency-denominated value of things) were also not natural.

        However the effects of those things were natural consequences, and that includes Inflation, which came in via increased energy prices, increased realestate prices (cheaper debt and the rush up the yield ladded of “investment” money pushed those up) and just the straightforward devaluation of money.

        However it seems that most of the inflation, at least beyond a certain point (this stuff was already happenning before the War) was not from the natural effect of those other things but rather companies taking advantage of the situation to, in a cartel-like fashion (not actually a Cartel in legal terms because they didn’t get together and agree to do so) pumping up prices in tandem to increase profits.

      • Maya@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course inflation is natural. Unless we are all gonna share the same $100 forever it has to happen at least without some sort of perfect foresight so the correct amount of money can be issued.

        What isn’t natural is somehow people are convinced they should be held hostage by business.

        When somehow we are convinced taking out a loan that you have to pay on for eternity (selling stock) that is not natural.

        When somehow limited resources (our time) has less value then an unlimited resource (money) that is not natural.

        • explodicle@local106.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It sounds like you’re saying why you think inflation is a good idea, not why it’s natural.

          Why not share the same $100 forever? As the value of $100 increases, we can just divide it up into smaller and smaller bills.

          We should be trading our limited time for another limited resource, not an unlimited one. At the time of the trade they’re always equal, but labor in the past should be worth more than that, not less.

          • Maya@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Dividing $100 into smaller and smaller pieces is the exact same thing as making money which causes inflation? If you divide it into 200 parts of fifty cents each and you only need 199 then someone has an extra fifty cents.

            • explodicle@local106.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not the same thing because each person’s percentage of the total supply doesn’t change, like it does with inflation.

    • huge_clock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Grocery stores are pretty much the definition of a perfectly competitive industry. The profit margins are always between 1 and 3%. The only reason they raise prices is because they have to.