• rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your last point is something that I often say: we’ll never figure out how to reverse aging, we’ll only figure out how to stop Elon Musk aging.

    On the philanthropy point: We used to have more progressive taxation systems that discouraged wealth-hoarding. For someone of arbitrarily large income, massive philanthropic acts were often ways to avoid paying taxes. They were going to lose the money either way, but by building a library, expanding a hospital, funding a humanitarian project, feeding the poor or whatever they could choose where the money was spent instead and, as others have said, get some good PR and legacy-building at the same time. Now their wealth isn’t threatened by taxation, why would they even consider relinquishing it?